Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama accuses GOP of demonizing health overhaul (as a "Bolshevik plot")
AP on Yahoo ^ | 1/29/10 | AP

Posted on 01/29/2010 5:49:10 PM PST by NormsRevenge

BALTIMORE – President Barack Obama is accusing Republicans of portraying health care overhaul legislation as a "Bolshevik plot."

...

The 1917 revolution in Russia brought the Bolsheviks to power. Vladimir Lenin and Josef Stalin were among the leaders.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bhofascism; bhotyranny; bolshevik; bolshevikplot; deathpanel; deathpanels; democrats; demonizing; gop; hillarycare; liberalprogressivism; obama; obamacare; romney; romneycare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: rockinqsranch
Seems to me he was chumming for angry, or frustration driven retorts that could be used against the Republicans when torqued by the twisted minds of his allies of the Leftist MSM. He seemed to be trying to create an antagonistic atmosphere for that purpose.

Well then, the pubs did very well by showing extreme deference, smiles and applause. If I heard mr president one more time I was sure to puke.

61 posted on 01/29/2010 7:42:00 PM PST by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody

Yes the Republicans handled the situation well.


62 posted on 01/29/2010 7:46:34 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
health care overhaul legislation as a "Bolshevik plot."

Egad, ZerO can utter a truth. It must be true, what, they say of a blind twit.

63 posted on 01/29/2010 7:57:15 PM PST by depressed in 06 (Tea parties today, Lexington tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

well, since he said it ........................


64 posted on 01/29/2010 8:46:58 PM PST by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Well, what would the Bolsheviks do if by some major national brain-fart they were to reach the Oval Office?

Do you believe they would start with planned famines, tanks rolling down Pennsylvania Ave., rich people dragged into the street and shot, mass executions?

Or, would they start with socialized medicine, a “National Security Force”, taking over major corporations (and handing them to unions), major tax hikes, major debt, public humiliation of the Supreme Court when they rule against you, cap ‘n trade, and on, and on...?

They could not even think about the first set of actions. But they sure as hell could move the second forward, couldn’t they?

Would they come out and say that they are communists, or would they hide it and lie, lie, lie?

An American President who wasn’t an anti-American leftist would not have to say something like this.

P.R.O.P.A.G.A.N.D.A.


65 posted on 01/29/2010 8:51:24 PM PST by Boucheau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

The heroes of 0bozo the commie pig! The oppressive dark cloud of totalitarian dictatorship is passed to the next (0bozo) generation!


66 posted on 01/29/2010 8:54:46 PM PST by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

Amen! And please Lord take this commie pig bastard 0bozo to his eternal place of damnation NOW!!!


67 posted on 01/29/2010 8:58:13 PM PST by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

“And most of the time, they are little better than the dumbasses who handed mighty Russia over to a ruthless regime that destroyed everything good in that nation and its satellites, leaving behind filth it will take centuries to clean up.”

That’s it!

They are the very definition of losers, the Champions of Mediocrity. The problem is that they have a habit of taking tens-of-millions of innocents with them as they fall in flames.

I fear liberals only in that they will pave the way for the horror that is the hard-left.

Barack 0bama is no liberal, he is the real-deal leftist, a communist. Or, if I am to give him the benefit of the doubt, he is a liberal suffering from malignant narcissism, i.e., would-be leftist Dictator.

He is no American Democrat, as such.


68 posted on 01/29/2010 9:10:57 PM PST by Boucheau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
According to the cycle of history you reveal, Obama will gather a similar fate. He is a target now after this fiasco at the Repubican retreat. Now he has cut off ALL bipartisanship possibilities by treating the Republicans like dirty little schoolboys who are bullies when the reverse is true.

Oama is a 100% partisan, having initiated a Pelosi /Reid Congressional policy that has locked the Republicans out of conference for a year.They even changed the locks on the doors,and kept the public in the dark about legislation. In other words its one party rule, and eff the public. Huge billes of over 2000 pages given out 72 hours befre a vote!!! And they complain about filibuster? Eff Obama.

And this parasitic prig of a touch hole pretend president is trying to say the Republicans are partisan? Buahahahahahahaha!

The Republicans have Obama exactly where they want him, squirming in the headlights of the November election truck.

THUMP-THUMP......We take the HOuse and Senate, and the we impech his treasonous A$$!!!!

69 posted on 01/29/2010 9:16:24 PM PST by Candor7 (((The effective weapons against Oba- Fascism are ridicule, derision , truth (.Member NRA)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I've seen Mister Obama, and his little 5-year "health" plan described in many ways (Marxist, collectivist, socialist, and etc.)

However, I haven't actually encountered the term "Bolshevik" associated with Mister Obama's healthcare confiscation scheme.

His use of the "Bolshevik" term is likely calculated, as anyone, no matter how far to the left can say truthfully that he is not one. (It's Clintonian parsing, but I'm pretty sure that no hyper-leftie self-refers as a Bolshevik.)

Thus, one could be a Marxist, a Stalinist, a Maoist, a Chavez-wannabe, etc and still claim NOT to be a Bolshevik.

Since Mister Obama chose to bring it up, perhaps someone from the media might ask Mister Obama to identify the large figures of history who he admires most (and least); and also the political ideologies which which he most closely derives his own beliefs.

.

70 posted on 01/29/2010 9:24:59 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Very nice summarization of Bolsheviks/Mensheviks... Thanks for the mini-history lesson!


71 posted on 01/29/2010 9:32:22 PM PST by DestroyLiberalism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

So who is “feeding” the teleprompter? Can’t be Rahm as he was in plain view.


72 posted on 01/29/2010 9:43:09 PM PST by sanjoaquinvalley (Long time lady lurker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty

I believe you have the right political answer.

I want to see the Drudge headlines: “The Rebirth of Bolshevism”; “The Bolshevik President”.

I want to see signs at the tea parties: “Stop the Bolsheviks Now”.

I want to see t-shirts: “Fighting Bolshevism since 2009”; “Bolshevism—Are We Doomed to Repeat It”.

Thanks


73 posted on 01/29/2010 9:44:09 PM PST by VaFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Notice how obama/progressive/socialist/marxist/revolutionary enjoys attempting to taunt those of us who know exactly who this enemy in the White House is, with references to his “bolshevik” connections? It's his way of saying, “I know who I am, and some of you know who I am, but there are plenty of them out there who don't have a clue.” His remarks are in keeping with the look of love in Rahm’s eyes in a shot recently of Rahm at the SOTU..you could see how Rahm was enthralled with the words of his leader...these people are twisted.
74 posted on 01/29/2010 10:18:56 PM PST by itssme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner

“...ask Mister Obama to identify the large figures of history who he admires most (and least); and also the political ideologies which which he most closely derives his own beliefs.”

You might some words from Mister 0bama, but you certainly wouldn’t get any truth.

I think his past associations, his own statements, and his actions tell us all we need to know, don’t you?


75 posted on 01/29/2010 11:52:08 PM PST by Boucheau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: rcrngroup; All

Would it be proper for a christian to pray for the destruction of Obama???

Lord Forgive Us


76 posted on 01/30/2010 12:50:09 AM PST by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
President Barack Obama is accusing Republicans of portraying health care overhaul legislation as a "Bolshevik plot."

Bolshevik:

The Bolsheviks, originally also Bolshevists, derived from bol'shinstvo, "majority", which comes from bol'she, "more", the comparative form of bol'shoi, "big") were a faction of the Marxist Russian Social Democratic Labour Party which split apart from the Menshevik faction at the Second Party Congress in 1903. The Bolsheviks were the majority faction in a crucial vote, hence their name. They ultimately became the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The Bolsheviks came to power in Russia during the October Revolution phase of the Russian Revolution of 1917, and founded the Soviet Union.

The Bolsheviks, founded by Vladimir Lenin, were an organization of professional revolutionaries under a democratic internal hierarchy governed by the principle of democratic centralism, who considered themselves as the vanguard of the revolutionary working class of Russia. Their beliefs and practices were often referred to as Bolshevism. Bolshevik revolutionary leader Leon Trotsky frequently used the terms "Bolshevism" and "Bolshevist" after his exile from the Soviet Union to differentiate between what he saw as true Leninism and the regime within the state and the party which arose under Stalin.

Hey Barry. Takes one to know one, Bud.

'Liberal' = 'Progressive' = Socialist = Marxist = Bolshevik = Communist.
They are a distinction without a difference. And so your Harvard Elite buddies can understand it, I'll put it this way:

L1+P1+S1+M1+B1 = C


77 posted on 01/30/2010 5:54:18 AM PST by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits [A. Einstein])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism

The true story behind the Russian revolution and its aftermath are jaw dropping inane. I’ve heard it described as if the whole thing was choreographed as a gigantic and evil Monty Python sketch.

For example, the “I Love You To Death”-style demise of Rasputin. Poisoned cake and wine with enough cyanide for five men, him possibly surviving because he had been taking poison himself for years to develop a resistance to it. Shot four times, stabbed, clubbed and castrated, yet still alive, they tied him up and pushed him under the ice of a river. He was still able to break out of his bounds, but drowned.

Up until the last part, his terrified assassins, trying to kill him over and over again and failing, kept going upstairs to listen to a recording of “Yankee Doodle” on a record player, to keep up their courage.

The rest of the revolution was just as wacky.

Nobody involved seemed to have any common sense or pattern recognition, making terrible mistakes again and again.

Another example was in the Duma, the parliament, where hundreds of mostly liberals and Mensheviks would assemble, with perhaps two dozen Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks would scream and bang desks, throw paper, blow whistles, etc., to disrupt the proceedings. Annoyed by this, the liberals and Mensheviks would stomp out of the chamber to show their displeasure.

But the Duma did not need a quorum to vote new laws. So as soon as they left, the Bolsheviks would take the podium, and start passing dozens of new laws by unanimous vote. Not just once, but day after day. And still the liberals and Mensheviks would stomp out, leaving the Bolsheviks in charge of the government.

Kerensky, the democratically elected spineless president, was terrified of Bolsheviks. It the capital of St. Petersburg, he was dictating a memo to his secretary one afternoon, when there was a loud noise on the street below. Terrified, Kerensky jumped on his desk and screamed that “The Bolsheviks are here, we must flee!”, or words to that effect.

His unruffled secretary calmly went over to the window, then suggested that it was just a car backfiring. So Kerensky climbed down from his desk, sat down, and continued to dictate his memo.

Eventually, his paranoia got the better of him, so he sent word to the war front, to a senior, right wing general who had supported the Czar, to be prepared to march on St. Petersburg, to defend the government from the Bolsheviks.

The general decided that Kerensky was such a worm, that he, the general, should become the new leader of Russia. So he ordered his army to march on St. Petersburg, to take over. On hearing that the army was advancing on him, Kerensky panicked again, and ordered the city police arsenal to issue rifles to—the Bolsheviks, so they could “defend the city”.

The Bolsheviks later used those rifles to conquer the government.

But in the short term, they just stood on the side of the road, and yelled to the general’s draftee soldiers to defect. They did. A famous photograph of the time shows the general finally arriving in St. Petersburg, with perhaps thirty of his subordinate officers and maybe a company of soldiers.

They were all arrested by the St. Petersburg police.

When Lenin finally took over, the inmates truly ruled the asylum. He tried dozens of failed social experiments, like abolishing the bureaucracy, progressive schools, encouraging “free love”, etc. Each one dumber than the previous. Essentially trying out every idea in the communist bible.

Had it not resulted in such a tragically high human cost, ti would have been very funny.


78 posted on 01/30/2010 7:14:53 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The new Demonrat mantra! Woof, woof, let granny eat dog food...spoof on 'let them eat cake'.The articles also contain the new big fees to Tricare for Life the retired over 65 Military's secondary health ins)

obama's war on seniors See the links in post 43-46 and on the last page.

Expanding support for families balancing work with caring for elderly relatives with a $102.5 million Caregiver Initiative adding $52.5 million in funding to Department of Health and Human Services caregiver support programs that provide temporary respite care, counseling, training, and referrals to critical services. The administration says the extra funding will allow nearly 200,000 additional caregivers to be served and 3 million more hours of respite care to be provided. It also adds $50 million to programs that provide transportation help, adult day care, and in-home services, such as aides to help seniors bathe and cook, help which eases the burden for family members and helps seniors stay in their homes.

Even the commie rag Mother Jones is reporting the cut and gut to granny's SS/Medicare.

http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/01/obama-puts-social-security-chopping-block

Bambi in his own words I' won't cut Medicare

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0EAP47SdcY

79 posted on 01/30/2010 7:33:27 AM PST by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, disabled,seniors & retired Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jersey117
Why was it such a big secret? If it was so great why weren't you out there telling us everything that was in it? Why is it 3,000 pages? Why were you negotiating behind closed doors?

...and costing 2 trillion dollars over 10 years!!!

80 posted on 01/30/2010 9:09:10 AM PST by painter (No wonder democrats don't mind taxes.THEY DON'T PAY THEM !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson