Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Speeding Up Missile Defenses in Persian Gulf
nytimes.com ^ | Jan. 30, 2010 | DAVID E. SANGER and ERIC SCHMITT

Posted on 01/30/2010 5:52:27 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is accelerating the deployment of new defenses against possible Iranian missile attacks in the Persian Gulf, placing special ships off the Iranian coast and antimissile systems in at least four Arab countries, according to administration and military officials.

The deployments come at a critical turning point in President Obama’s dealings with Iran. After months of unsuccessful diplomatic outreach, the administration is trying to win broad international consensus for sanctions against the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, which Western nations say control a covert nuclear arms program.

Mr. Obama spoke of the shift in his State of the Union address, warning of “consequences” if Iran continued to defy United Nations demands to stop manufacturing nuclear fuel. And Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton publicly warned China on Friday that its opposition to sanctions was shortsighted.

The news that the United States is deploying antimissile defenses — including a rare public discussion of them by Gen. David H. Petraeus — appears to be part of a coordinated administration strategy to increase pressure on Iran.

The deployments are also partly intended to counter the impression that Iran is fast becoming the most powerful military force in the Middle East, to forestall any Iranian escalation of its confrontation with the West if new sanctions are imposed. In addition, the administration is trying to show Israel that there is no immediate need for military strikes against Iranian nuclear and missile facilities, according to administration officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

By highlighting the defensive nature of the buildup, the administration was hoping to avoid a sharp response from Tehran.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aegis; iran; nukes; patriot

1 posted on 01/30/2010 5:52:27 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Hope a couple of batteries are defending Israel as well.


2 posted on 01/30/2010 6:41:00 PM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY; All
"The Obama administration is accelerating the deployment of new defenses against possible Iranian missile attacks in the Persian Gulf...."


3 posted on 01/30/2010 7:46:50 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

So are hrs bigger then theirs


4 posted on 01/30/2010 7:48:59 PM PST by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Oh, *now* missile defenses are suddenly good. How many times did the Dems blast missile defenses as being a pipe dream. Hypocrits, all.


5 posted on 01/30/2010 7:49:20 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy; JustPiper

ping


6 posted on 01/30/2010 7:49:59 PM PST by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
This makes no sense at all.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Everyone knows it's impossible to hit a bullet with a bullet. < /sarc>

gitmo

7 posted on 01/30/2010 7:53:08 PM PST by gitmo (FR vs DU: n4mage vs DUmage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Presidents are not above starting a war to rally support from the American people and to distract them from the administration’s domestic policies.


8 posted on 01/30/2010 8:59:53 PM PST by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla

Thanks Zilla, does BHO know?


9 posted on 01/30/2010 9:14:18 PM PST by JustPiper (WHERE is the "Progress" in PROGRESSIVE?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: musicman

10 posted on 02/01/2010 8:31:35 AM PST by ncfool (The new USSA - United Socialst States of AmeriKa. Welcome to Obummers world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ncfool

11 posted on 02/01/2010 8:41:13 AM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson