Posted on 01/31/2010 11:39:15 AM PST by pissant
I think Barbara was trying to get him to say something negative about her, and of course he didn’t. The democrats are afraid of Sarah and now Scott also.
Barbara Walters is a baboon’s ass. I can’t stand that witch. All she does is kiss the Obama’s ass every second
It’s called ‘divide and conquer’ and it’s played by the same group daily.
I am surprised by Breitbart’s misleading headline.
LOL.
She’s such an old hag. Way past her time to retire too.
You are absolutely right on, and Breitbart is the one responsible for that.
We are giving him a chance, but remember his voting record in Mass.(pro choice etc.) shows some left wing stripes to him. We have been burned before. Remember before 2006 the Repubs had the Congress and the Presidency and squandered their opportunity to reduce the size of government and opened the door for the current crop of socialists/communists. Remember what Reagan said “Trust but verify”.
“Interesting so many on FR find no fault with Obama to the point they find no negatives to post against Obama.
But, These same FReepers can’t wait bash Sarah Palin or Scott Brown and post away.”
Excellent, insightful post.
As they say, none are so blind that will not see. People should stop and think about what you said, unfortunately your observation is completely correct. People need to wake up and see who the real enemy is.
I seem to remember another hyper-ambitious US Senator, who barely having been elected to the Senate decided he was just the man to be the next President. Name: John Edwards
I seem to remember another hyper-ambitious US Senator, who barely having been elected to the Senate decided he was just the man to be the next President. Name: Barrack Obama
I seem to remember another hyper-ambitious US Senator, who barely having been elected to the Senate decided he was just the man to be the next President. Name: Scott Brown
If history is any indication, we should keep a VERY close eye on this guy. He took advantage of a situation to get where he is, so he will clearly take advantages when they are presented if it furthers his ambitions.
I seem to remember another hyper-ambitious US Senator, who barely having been elected to the Senate decided he was just the man to be the next President. Name: Scott Brown
And your evidence that Scott Brown "decided he was just the man to be the next President" is...?
Please show me
The headline posted here by Pissant and copied from Breitbart is leading, and misleading. Without that headline, you would never deduce from Brown's answer to Walters that he was even considering the Presidency.
EEEk. Upon reflection my previous post sounds harsher than I meant it to. I sent money to Brown, and I believe he was the right guy in the right place at the right time. If Brown goes to DC and does his job for the reminder of the term (not that I expect him to be totally conservative on all issues) then it’s fine.
But I am very wary now of ambitious senators. That’s all I was trying to say.
“WTF? Is this guy a white version of Obama?”
________
I don’t get what race has to do with anything.
If Roe was overturned by SCOTUS, the abortion issue would revert back to the states and those state laws that existed before Roe would be enforce again. That would definitely reduce the number of abortions nationally. The next step would be to get a Human Life amendment to the Constitution, similar to the one Reagan proposed back in the early 1980`s.
However, Scott Brown is an unapologetic abortion proponent and he supports Roe v Wade as the Constitutional law of the land. Many CongressCritters oppose partial birth abortion. After all, its infanticide and its inherently evil. Even Dirty Harry Reid opposes PBA.
Reagan was out front and open in public about his opposition to Roe v Wade and abortion on demand, and stated so on numerous occasions. In 1976, Reagan chose pro-life champion Richard Schweiker, one of the earliest supporters of a Human LIfe amendment to the Constitution, to be his running mate. Marking the GOP as the Pro-Life party in America. In 1983 President Reagan wrote his famous essay, Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation. Reagan was never "in your face" on any isssue, but he was always out front on the abortion issue.
So what! I never commented either way on whether those were your words or not. I merely took exception to such a factually incorrect statement. Btw, wasn't that reply posted by you? Yeah boy!
>>>>>Definitely, 8 years of Obama is so much better, than Scott Brown as president. (more sarc)
This flippant remark shows you don't respect the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution and the right to life components of both documents. Once again, you can not be taken seriously. Neither Obama or Brown are pro-life and neither one would EVER get my vote.
LOL.....well, her scoundrel of a husband.
Scott Brown- Michele Bachmann . .
Team 2012
Overturning Roe v. Wade is a pipe dream.
We’ve now found out that Scott Brown is pro-choice. He’s FOR the killing of children in the womb. That tells me all I need to know. A man of no character. Scratch another one of the list.
You are kinder than me.
One one hand, ObaMao set the bar pretty low. On the other, after three more years of suffering under his misrule, I'm confident that the bar will be raised just a little bit.
He might be, for the GOP -- but not for Conservatives. He's pro-choice, which means he's FOR the killing of children in the womb. How much more disgusting could he be?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.