Heaven forbid the Republicans should nominate someone who can actually beat Obama. Much better to nominate a fine pure solid conservative with no chance of appealing to independents and end up with another 4 years of Obama. Yes, definitely, that is the conservative thing to do.
4 more years of Obama! (sarc)
Here is an article in the Christian Post about him:
“I am a fiscal conservative. And when it comes to issues affecting people’s pockets, and pocketbooks, and wallets, I’ll be with the Republicans if they are in fact pushing those initiatives,” Brown said in an interview set to air Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.”
But Brown isn’t your typical pro-choice politician either.
“Roe v. Wade is the law of the land, but I think we need to do more to reduce the amount of abortions,” he stated. “And the difference between me and maybe others is that I’m very - I’m against partial-birth abortions. I’m against federal funding of abortions. And I believe in a strong parental consent notification law.”
http://www.christianpost.com/article/20100131/scott-brown-pro-choice-but-different/index.html
Definitely, 8 years of Obama is so much better, than Scott Brown as president. (more sarc)
BULL! Pro-choice = Pro-abortion! Brown is a hardcore abortion proponent. He believes Roe v Wade gives every women a Constitutional right to kill their unborn baby. The number of PBA's carried out every year in the US is a fraction of all abortions performed annually in the US. Brown supports abortion rights in 99.5% of all abortion cases.
Time for the obligatory advertisement. FRee Republic is a Pro-life conservative forum. Candidates like Brown, Giuliani, Romney, Schwarzenegger and Meg Whitman do nothing to advance the Pro-Life agenda or conservatism.
Unfortunately, Roe vs. Wade IS the law of the land and I seriously doubt any president will ever get that overturned. Whether we like it or not, abortion is legal. That doesn’t mean we have to condone it. He says he is against federal funding for it, and that makes him ok in my book.
Some on here are so naive regarding politics. We need a candidate who can beat zero. Remember, we have a system of checks and balances. Or, used to, I should say.
Scott is very strong on national defense, illegal amnesty, spending, etc. So, some on here would rather put up a one-issue candidate and have 4 more years of mmmmmm Obama.
In today’s society, JFK would be considered a Republican. Gone is the DEMRAT party of the 60’s. No, I’m not in favor of a RINO, but, I don’t think Scott is 100% RINO.
A president has to be president of everyone, not just a few select people. However, it seems that zero didn’t get that message.
Let’s see how he pans out in the Senate. Right now, I think he could give zero a run for the office. And, if people voted for o because he was charming, and good looking,(barf) he pales in comparison to Scott.