Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran hails successful launch of satellite rocket
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jDJTHPpLUYb3WUzzphdkkrcO9HPA ^

Posted on 02/03/2010 1:51:50 AM PST by jhpigott

TEHRAN — Iran hailed the successful launch of a home-built satellite on Wednesday amid Western concerns it is using its nuclear and space industries to develop atomic and ballistic weapons.

The Kavoshgar 3 (Explorer) rocket was carrying an "experimental capsule", state-owned Al-Alam television reported.

State television's website said it was carrying "live animals" -- a rat, turtles and worms, the first such experiment by Iran in space technology.

"The capsule has the ability to send back empirical data," the website said.

State television showed footage of the rocket being fired from a desert launchpad leaving behind a thick plume of smoke.

A few minutes later the grainy images showed the capsule detaching from the rocket and spinning in orbit.

State television also carried pictures of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad unveiling another home-built rocket for satellite launches dubbed the Simorgh (Phoenix).

The milk-bottle shaped rocket, emblazoned in blue with the words "Satellite Carrier Simorgh," is equipped to carry a 100-kilogramme (220-pound) satellite 500 kilometres (310 miles) into orbit, the television report said.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; iran; iraniannukes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 02/03/2010 1:51:50 AM PST by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maquiladora; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

ping


2 posted on 02/03/2010 1:52:29 AM PST by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

3 posted on 02/03/2010 1:57:26 AM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

State television also carried pictures of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad unveiling another home-built rocket for satellite launches dubbed the Simorgh (Phoenix).

~~~

“Lookit’Meeee!”,,,

(Watch North)...


4 posted on 02/03/2010 2:05:55 AM PST by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott
"Tehran denies having military goals for its space programme or its nuclear drive."

Oh, well then, nothing to worry about here. Move along.

5 posted on 02/03/2010 2:06:07 AM PST by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

Looks like a good target for testing our missile defense system.


6 posted on 02/03/2010 2:11:09 AM PST by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

“Defence Minister Ahmad Vahidi revealed the details of three new satellite prototypes — the Toloo (Dawn), Navid (Good News), and Mesbah-2 (Lantern).”

Good News 2-11?


7 posted on 02/03/2010 2:14:34 AM PST by Selene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

And Obama cancelled our missile defense. He will get us all killed if we do not stop his insanity.


8 posted on 02/03/2010 2:33:19 AM PST by screaminsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

ICBM program.


9 posted on 02/03/2010 2:56:30 AM PST by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott; Yehuda; sheik yerbouty; null and void
State television's website said it was carrying "live animals" -- a rat, turtles and worms, the first such experiment by Iran in space technology.

"The capsule has the ability to send back empirical data*," the website said.

*"Tastes like chicken."

10 posted on 02/03/2010 4:00:24 AM PST by Ezekiel (The Obama-nation began with the Inauguration of Desolation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

When ImANutJob said Feb 11th would take away the Capitalist system, I said - ‘whatever’. When I see this, I think - can these idiots even try to pull off some type of EMP detonation? They’d be stupid enough to try.


11 posted on 02/03/2010 4:13:49 AM PST by time4good
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ezekiel
*"Tastes like chicken."

LOL!

12 posted on 02/03/2010 4:13:51 AM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell; John O; Leisler; All
There are those who claim Iran was incapable of this type of technological progress without outside experts, but from everything I've seen, they are exporting scientists, not bringing ones in. Anyone have a source contradicting that?
13 posted on 02/03/2010 4:18:19 AM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott
The Kavoshgar 3 (Explorer) rocket was carrying an "experimental capsule", state-owned Al-Alam television reported...carrying "live animals" -- a rat, turtles and worms"

OK, the turtles (the mullahs, always hiding beneath their shells) I get, and the worms (Ahmadinnerjacket and his Basiji cult followers) I get, but who is the 'Rat?

"Oh, to dream..."
Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
14 posted on 02/03/2010 4:28:19 AM PST by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott
Here's a little something to ponder: a Wall Street Journal article written just a couple of weeks after the 2008 election: "What a Single Nuclear Warhead Could Do"

Consider Iran. For the past decade, Iran -- with the assistance of Russia, China and North Korea -- has been developing missile technology. Iranian Defense Minister Ali Shamkhani announced in 2004 their ability to mass produce the Shahab-3 missile capable of carrying a lethal payload to Israel or -- if launched from a ship -- to an American city.

The current controversy over Iran's nuclear production is really about whether it is capable of producing nuclear warheads. This possibility is made more urgent by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's statement in 2005: "Is it possible for us to witness a world without America and Zionism? But you had best know that this slogan and this goal are attainable, and surely can be achieved."

Mr. Ahmadinejad takes seriously, even if the average Iranian does not, radical Islam's goal of converting, subjugating or destroying the infidel peoples -- first and foremost the citizens of the U.S. and Israel. Even after 9/11, we appear not to take that threat seriously. We should.

Think about this scenario: An ordinary-looking freighter ship heading toward New York or Los Angeles launches a missile from its hull or from a canister lowered into the sea. It hits a densely populated area. A million people are incinerated. The ship is then sunk. No one claims responsibility. There is no firm evidence as to who sponsored the attack, and thus no one against whom to launch a counterstrike.

But as terrible as that scenario sounds, there is one that is worse. Let us say the freighter ship launches a nuclear-armed Shahab-3 missile off the coast of the U.S. and the missile explodes 300 miles over Chicago. The nuclear detonation in space creates an electromagnetic pulse (EMP).

Gamma rays from the explosion, through the Compton Effect, generate three classes of disruptive electromagnetic pulses, which permanently destroy consumer electronics, the electronics in some automobiles and, most importantly, the hundreds of large transformers that distribute power throughout the U.S. All of our lights, refrigerators, water-pumping stations, TVs and radios stop running. We have no communication and no ability to provide food and water to 300 million Americans.


This is what is referred to as an EMP attack, and such an attack would effectively throw America back technologically into the early 19th century. It would require the Iranians to be able to produce a warhead as sophisticated as we expect the Russians or the Chinese to possess. But that is certainly attainable. Common sense would suggest that, absent food and water, the number of people who could die of deprivation and as a result of social breakdown might run well into the millions.

Far too uncomfortable to think about, much less do something about. So we as a nation in effect put our fingers in our ears and yell as loud as we can: LALALALALA! I can't hear you!

15 posted on 02/03/2010 5:00:29 AM PST by southernnorthcarolina (Now with ConstructionCam! Click on my name and follow the progress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina
As bad as that scenario sounds, I would rather endure that than what would be in store for Iran.
16 posted on 02/03/2010 5:43:41 AM PST by beef (Who Killed Kennewick Man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

And now Obama is turning NASA into a research entity to study Global Warming (Climate Change). Even part of the Pentagon is supposed to study this!!!!!

Idiots....


17 posted on 02/03/2010 5:47:46 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

Premature launch??? Or is this another build-up for his Feb. 11th “show” that is supposedly going to end the US? I pray Obama isn’t too busy monitoring Reuters to be ready to act...


18 posted on 02/03/2010 7:30:28 AM PST by LibertyRocks (Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

“a rat, a turtle, and worms”

Congress had better beef up security! It seems that Iranian agents have kidnapped some of them and shot them into space!!!! Yeeeaaarrrggghhhh!!!!!


19 posted on 02/03/2010 7:47:18 AM PST by left that other site (Your Mi'KMaq Paddy Whacky Bass Playing Biker Buddy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

Funny, just last night my wife asked if we should be worried about getting nuked.

I told her the Middle East and Europe may have to worry but Iran didn’t have the mean to nuke the US unless by boat.

Guess I was wrong and we do have to worry now.


20 posted on 02/03/2010 8:01:48 AM PST by hattend (Mary Jo, this one's for you! (Thank you, Massachusetts - welcome back to the union))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson