To: euram
Boy this is interesting legal ground. An undeclared candidate, giving a political speech, while being employed by a news outlet, possibly being coved by opposing media channels, etc, etc...???
2 posted on
02/03/2010 3:47:37 AM PST by
Dem Guard
To: Dem Guard
“
An undeclared candidate, giving a political speech, while being employed by a news outlet” That is new how?
Only declared candidates can give political speeches?
When did they change the first amendment then?
To: Dem Guard
To: Dem Guard
Boy this is interesting legal ground. An undeclared candidate, giving a political speech, while being employed by a news outlet, possibly being coved by opposing media channels, etc, etc...??? Not a fan of free speech?
To: Dem Guard
Operative words: “Undeclared candidate”.
To: paulycy; darkangel82; Darksheare; Arrowhead1952; 50cal Smokepole; rabscuttle385; darkwing104; ...
Kitty hungry!
To: Dem Guard; darkwing104; Old Sarge; 50mm; rabscuttle385
Boy this is interesting legal groundSarah is a private citizen. She is undeclared, therefore she is, duh, *not* a candidate and has no special limits on her speech.
Fox News can broadcast just about anything they want on cable except porn and a couple other things. They decide what will interest their viewers. Same goes for the other channels.
So, what's your beef? What is it, exactly, that's you find unclear?
Freedom got your tongue?
25 posted on
02/03/2010 5:03:53 AM PST by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality.)
To: Dem Guard
No...a private citizen, employed by a news agency for POLITICAL COMMENT, giving a political speech...
Fixed with PROPER context.
To: Dem Guard
Boy this is interesting legal ground. An undeclared candidate, giving a political speech, while being employed by a news outlet, possibly being coved by opposing media channels, etc, etc...??? How is it "interesting" legal ground? She's undeclared, and speaking before a gathering that is not a political party, so there goes the "partisan" argument. So, what's the issue?
37 posted on
02/03/2010 5:58:18 AM PST by
ScottinVA
(Glad to see Demonic Unhinged (DU) highlights and attacks my FR comments!)
To: Dem Guard
Boy this is interesting legal ground. An undeclared candidate, giving a political speech, while being employed by a news outlet, possibly being coved by opposing media channels, etc, etc...??? A little FRiendly advice. Next time use a [/sarc] tag or you may end up as a whiff of ozone.
42 posted on
02/03/2010 7:25:58 AM PST by
McGruff
(Love ya Sarah but I will support and contribute to JD Hayworth.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
