Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Help in Sight, More Homeowners Walk Away
NYT ^ | 02/03/10 | DAVID STREITFELD

Posted on 02/03/2010 7:05:10 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: moehoward

RE :”I’m sorry.”

For which part? I have good credit! LOL it’s called not buying things on credit (short a real emergency.)

Some people get sick and run up debts because of that unfortunately. I dont want to pick on everyone.


61 posted on 02/03/2010 10:58:15 AM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill

I personally agree with you. However my point was that most people in this country are far less reluctant to walk away from an underwater mortgage if they see large companies allowed to do the same to the tune of billions of dollars. Trillion dollar bailouts to millionaires and billionaires don’t help either, and since we are the government, we are allowing this. (Granted half of that “WE” are idiot socialists)


62 posted on 02/03/2010 11:01:56 AM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Correct. Either way income, or collection from the bank these people think they’re just walking away but that may not be possible.


63 posted on 02/03/2010 11:24:43 AM PST by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

You said your Grandmother couldn’t get a job or credit.

Sorry to hear that.


64 posted on 02/03/2010 11:26:50 AM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
people have to be responsible for poor borrowing decisions

There is, in the law, a principal known as fraudulent inducement. If you sucker someone into signing a contract based on false information, then the contract is not a valid contract.

In the present instance, the system conspired to tell individuals that a. prices will never be this cheap again b. real estate always go up c. If you want a place to live and raise a family you have to buy d. You cannot lose money and e. Here is the loan to buy the house.

I lived in California and DC for a long time and resisted these pressures, until DC prices collapsed under Marion Barry. a. It almost cost me my marriage. b. It was miserable sticking it out for a decade waiting for an opportunity and c. The other 99% of the population did not understand what a mess everything was.

Hell a lot of freepers today won't admit what a mess it was. Perhaps you are among them.

The whole system was a fraud from Greenspan, Milken, and a number of heads of investment banks and mortgage lenders all the way down. You cannot really blame the poor sucker at that bottom who never stood a chance.

65 posted on 02/03/2010 11:39:19 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

RE :”You said your Grandmother couldn’t get a job or credit. Sorry to hear that.”

LOL, she got SS for over 35 years. What is our chances?

Granny was on Social Security at the time and in those days you had to have a job to get a CC, SS didnt fly. Yet her house was fully paid off and owned and she had no debts (or credit history apparently) . .

Those where the days before we created the consumer debt consumption economy and government bailouts. So forclosures were rare and divorces were considered bad too. The Chinese (PRC) have those lost morals ironically , saving and married parents.


66 posted on 02/03/2010 11:42:14 AM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
See post #37. If you can’t understand that then you are hopelessly ignorant.

OK, Mr. Obama. ("Those who disagree with me are stupid!")

67 posted on 02/03/2010 11:53:49 AM PST by TChris ("Hello", the politician lied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Carley

actually if these people file bankruptcy, the founders included enabling language in the body of the constitution before the bill of rights.


68 posted on 02/03/2010 12:29:53 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

actually the first round of cards are the “sucker cards” (the new laws going into effect this month address those)

I am talking about regular cards that come through with normal limits.

this is because the filers have an 8 year preclusion from filing a ch 7 and a 2 year preclusion from filing a ch 13.

You do realise there is a specific federal statute precluding someone from being fired because they have filed bankruptcy.


69 posted on 02/04/2010 10:44:41 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

that law was changed.


70 posted on 02/04/2010 10:45:33 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
RE :”You do realise there is a specific federal statute precluding someone from being fired because they have filed bankruptcy.

Never heard of that, sounds typical. (The exception would be security clearances.)

But it is NOT illegal to discriminate when hiring or renting based on credit rating. MD state did outlaw giving discounts for home owners insurance for good credit history, that ended up like another tax on the responsible as our premiums went up to pay for it. It is illegal in MD to discriminate on housing or employment for that mysterious 'sexual orientation'

71 posted on 02/04/2010 10:53:32 AM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
RE :” actually the first round of cards are the “sucker cards” (the new laws going into effect this month address those)

You mean crappy credit cards for bad risks? I pointed that out in a later reply.

RE :” this is because the filers have an 8 year preclusion from filing a ch 7 and a 2 year preclusion from filing a ch 13.

Please explain.

72 posted on 02/04/2010 10:56:22 AM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson