To: Crim; politicket
I must point out..bush Tarp and Obama’s TARP are two different things... Bush’s was in the form of LOANS...And both were flagrantly unconstitutional!
12 posted on
02/04/2010 11:27:26 PM PST by
rabscuttle385
(Purge the RINOs! * http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
To: rabscuttle385
Was it unconstitutional to give chrysler a loan in the 80s?
20 posted on
02/04/2010 11:45:08 PM PST by
Crim
To: rabscuttle385
And both were flagrantly unconstitutional! Yep. Part of my "a pox on both their Houses" disaffection.
68 posted on
02/05/2010 6:45:59 AM PST by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
To: rabscuttle385
That's "fragrantly".
("cuz they stunk to high heaven.)
Cheers!
99 posted on
02/05/2010 4:46:02 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson