Posted on 02/05/2010 5:47:16 AM PST by central_va
Travis, thanks for the Ferfal book.
Thanks, I will give it a look.
But those gains resulted from seasonal adjustments to the data. Without those adjustments, the data show fewer people had jobs last month.
Let me repeat that:
the data show fewer people had jobs last month
AP can spin as madly as an out of balance washing machine for all I care, but bottom line, all of those actual American voters with fewer actual jobs will be showing up at the voting booth in a really bad mood, and the vote counts won't be seasonally adjusted, either.
They don’t have the ability to measure within .5 percent .The result is a calculated from various imprecise measurements.
The accuracy of the calculated value can be no more precise than the least precise measurement and .5% is probably the absolute upper limit of measurement precision.
Numbers are juggled, therefore unemployment... What a bunch of amateurish BS.
It’s an odd practice to not consider someone unemployed when they are actually jobless.
Real Unemployment Rate is 22% - Welcome to Obamaville And The Second Great Depression...
http://ronbosoldier.blogspot.com/2010/02/real-unemployment-rate-22.html
It’s an outrageous perversion of logic,that’s for sure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.