Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: savedbygrace

I don’t blame them for this. It IS a competitors brand/trademark after all isn’t it?

Besides, they own the distribution method and do all the hosting themselves.

Sorry, their toy, their store, their network... their rules.

I love how this is an issue. You want a better approval system just so you can use “Android” as an app name? Go invent yourself a 4g, touchscreen, robust OS device to do it on. Oh and while you’re at it find an exclusive national carrier, fund the staff to approve and bug test apps, do the marketing, sales, put up a web site, host the storage, pay for the bandwidth and continue to upgrade the OS to remain competitive.

Sorry folks, playing on a closed system... you play by the system holder’s rules. This reminds me so much of software companies complaining about the stranglehold Nintendo had on the video game business in the 80’s. No one could beat them at their own game so it MUST be Nintendo was breaking the law.


9 posted on 02/06/2010 6:25:24 AM PST by PittsburghAfterDark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: PittsburghAfterDark

What you said.

As long as Apple keeps being such an effective competitor they get to make the rules.

Historically speaking, it’s likely somebody will knock them off their perch before too long.


10 posted on 02/06/2010 6:32:15 AM PST by Sherman Logan (Never confuse schooling with education.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson