Posted on 02/06/2010 9:11:54 PM PST by LibFreeUSA
Careful, Mr OKeefe ! Dont go there! Nothing in the FBI affidavit even hints that you brushed with the type of swinishness and ethical squalor 60 Minutes was capable of, especially on April 16, 2000.
Ill report. Yall decide:
On April 16, 2000, viewers of CBS 60 Minutes saw Dan Rather interviewing Elian Gonzalezs father, Juan Miguel Gonzalez. America saw a bewildered and heartsick father simply pleading to be allowed to have his motherless son accompany him back to Cuba, his cherished homeland. How could anyone oppose this? How could simple decency and common sense possibly allow for anything else?
Did you cry? the pained and frowning Dan Rather asked the bereaved father during the 60 Minutes drama.A father never runs out of tears, Juan (actually, the voice of Juans drama school-trained translator) sniffled back to Dan. And the 60 Minutes prime-time audience could hardly contain their own sniffles.
Heres what America didnt see:
Most of the questions Dan Rather was asking Elians father during that 60 Minutes interview were being handed to him by Gregory Craig, recalls Pedro Porro, who served as Rathers in-studio translator during the taping of the famous interview. Dan Rather would ask the question in English into Porros earpiece and Porro would translate it into Spanish for Elians heavily-guarded father. Juan Miguel Gonzalez was surrounded by Castro security agents the entire time he was in the studio with Rather and Craig.
Officially, Gregory Craig served as attorney for Elians father, Juan Miguel Gonzalez. This humble man worked as a hotel doorman in a nation where the average monthly salary is $17. The high-rolling Gregory Craig, a Bill Clinton crony and until recently Obamas White House Counsel, then worked for Washington D.C.s elite firm, Williams & Connolly, one of Americas highest-priced law firms.
Upon accepting the case, Craig had flown to Cuba for a meeting with Fidel Castro. Craigs remuneration, we learned shortly after his return, came from a voluntary fund set up by the United Methodist Board of Church and Society and administered by the National Council of Churches. The same MSM reporters and pundits, who routinely erupt with snide snorts midway through any statement by any Republican, reported this item with a straight face. But then, this media also reports that Castros Cuba provides free and exquisite health-care. And the explanation of Craigs compensation issued from the same source. So no surprise. Said Porro:
It was obvious that Gregory Craig and Rather where on very friendly terms. They were joshing and bantering back and forth, as Juan Miguel sat there petrified, under the constant vigilance of Castros security men. Craig was stage managing the whole thingalmost like a movie director. The taping would stop and hed walk over to Dan, hand him a little slip of paper, say something into his ear. Then Rather would read straight from the paper.
At one point Craig stopped the taping almost like a movie director yelling Cut! I was confused for a moment, recalls Mr Porro, until Craig complained that Juan Miguels answers were not coming across from his translator with sufficient emotion. So Dan Rather shut everything down for a while and some of the crew drove to a drama school in New York. They hired a dramatic actor to act as a translator, and brought him back.
Okay roll em!
I probably should have walked out, but Id been hired by CBS in good faith and I didnt know exactly how the interview would be editedhow it would come across on the screen. I might have known, but you never know these things play out until you actually see it.
A week later, Janet Renos INS maced, kicked, stomped, gun-butted and tear-gassed their way into Lazaro Gonzalezs house, wrenched a bawling six-year-old child from his family at machine-gun point, and bundled him off to a Stalinist nation (against his fathers true wishes.) They left 102 people injured, some seriously. Many of the injured were ladies who had brandished dangerous weapons. These weapons were rosaries.
No 60 Minutes investigative report on that however.
As mentioned, upon accepting the case, Gregory Craig had flown to Cuba to confer with El Lider Maximo (translates almost exactly to Der Führer in German). To effectively stage-manage the boys shanghaiing, Craig explained to Castro, he needed Juan Miguel in the U.S. According to most accounts, Castro balked at this. No plantation owner likes his slaves traveling (unescorted) outside his plantation. Plus, Castro was no doubt privy to Juan Miguels early communications with his Miami cousins, thanking them profusely and saying hed be soon make his own escape and join Elian.
So it took a little doing, but Craig finally prevailedthat Castros escorts would constantly accompany Juan Miguel in the U.S. (as witnessed by Pedro Porro) was probably the gist of the deal with Craig.
So in effect, the man who until recently served as Obamas Chief White House Counsel, once agreed to function as a fully deputized agent for a Stalinist regimes KGB-trained secret police, and arranged to have Castros child-kidnapping smokescreened by his chums at CBS.
And lest we forget, the Deputy Attorney General who
draped the legal veneer over the above was none other than Eric Holder.
I am sure we are all shocked and stunned by this news. not.
Just like Waco.
I tell you, whoever said that to Rather and then bopped him one is a national hero in my book. I wish we could bring him back and give him a list of others to bop (Sissy Chrissy, Keith Overbite, Matt Liar, I could go on and on).
A small bit of justice served; At least Craig and Rather got a seven course meal of karma.
When evil Janet Reno came to Colorado, shortly thereafter, I had
T-shirts made with the commandos in Elian’s face photo with some
kind of sound bite, like - “Reno, go home” to wear to her welcoming
party.
Shameless behavior on the part of the U.S. !!!
I’ve often wondered what happened to that poor little boy. Did Castro attempt to raise him as his own personal true believer? Even Castro’s daughter escaped and denounced her father; will little Elian (now a teen) ever have that chance? Has he been brainwashed to think his family are the essence of evil, or does he hold, in a secret part of his heart, the memory of those who truly loved and wanted the best for him? Or does he blame them? So many questions... so few answers.
If we only had an honest MSM, this travesty of justice would never have happened.
You know, I have never noticed how brave that man looks. For those of us that know, we realize that a part of his brain is probably screaming, but his body is moving forward and is strong. Considering that this guy has been able to hear terrible noises closing in on him for at least a very long minute or more, this is an impressive man.
What evil - truly evil - scum.
bm
That piece of sh%% Holder always seems to show up wherever the sleaziest corruption is.
Liberals are so thuggy. I hope we defeat every damn one of them...
The full story of the Cuban water boy saga remains to be told.
Very reminiscent of "The Buddha's Smile," the story-within-a-story in Solzhenitsyn's novel The First Circle about Eleanor Roosevelt's visit to a Soviet concentration camp.
A caution: Our POTUS and Company don’t want to *defeat* you. They don’t see “opponents,” only “enemies,” and they want to *destroy* you. Think about appropriate responses.
I am sure we are all shocked and stunned by this news.
You know, I'm not shocked by the accusations of manipulation. I am stunned by the gory details. Turning control of an interview over to representatives of the interviewee should never, ever happen in legitimate journalism.
The interviewee was basically a prisoner it sounds like inside our free country. Our own government officials helped make sure he could never say anything other than what Castro dictated.
Sissy Chrissy, Keith Overbite, Matt Liar,
You know, I don't have a problem with Chris or Keith (in the following context). They deal in opinion, like Limbaugh, O'Reilly, and Hannity. They have hung up their journalist "shingles", if they ever had them, and entered the world of editorializing.
Rather, on the other hand, and Charlie Gibson, whom I feel committed journalistic malpractice with his interview of Sarah Palin, cover themselves in the "cloak of objectivity", which is clearly deceptive.
That’s stunning and repugnant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.