Here is what I love about these guys. On the one hand they will make anecdotal observations supporting globull warming when convenient. This ass hat did that in relaying stories about snow fall and the memories of his childhood around the DC area then comparing it with current weather. Then when those observations are controverted by events they sniff “anecdotal observations have no bearing on the validity of globull warming”. It really is frustrating because truth is not what is driving the debate. So if you are operating under the mistaken premise that truth matters and try to have a rational discussion about an irrational premise... Well, how does an argument like that ever turn out?
There's a LOT of that kind of rationalization going on at DU lately, particularly with the snow storm that just buried the East Coast Commune known as our capitol.