Democrats beat Repubs to the punch?
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
These three are endangered species. LOL
2 posted on
02/08/2010 3:53:17 PM PST by
Carley
(Are you better off now than one year ago? HELL NO!!!!!)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
This “may” be a bi-partisan piece of legislation in the making. Usually I would run away from a piece of dimoKKKRAT legislation as fast as I can.
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Don’t think so, Not one Repub voted for the cap-n-trade in the house did they? If so who?
4 posted on
02/08/2010 3:55:07 PM PST by
Doulos1
(Bitter Clinger Forever)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Collin Peterson just trying to pimp for more ethanol.
5 posted on
02/08/2010 3:56:00 PM PST by
WOBBLY BOB
(ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
To: Graybeard58; Man50D; CedarDave; Question Liberal Authority; steelyourfaith
6 posted on
02/08/2010 3:56:15 PM PST by
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
(Pat Caddell: Democrats are drinking kool-aid in a political Jonestown)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Puhleze, Republicans can only hope to block Democrat efforts. You think any bill they propose would hit the floor?
One caveat to that. ANY Republican who supports carbon taxes is toast. I can think of a few that would be good toast.
7 posted on
02/08/2010 3:59:18 PM PST by
wattsmag2
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
carbon emissions Yeah, I heard that term on the radio today.
Carbon emissions would be soot and black smoke. Carbon would still burn. CO2 is carbon that has already burned and the carbon is rendered stable by two stubborn oxygen atoms.
"Carbon emissions" is just a propaganda term to fool people into believing a lie.
It's not like cars are driving around belching soot and black smoke.
8 posted on
02/08/2010 4:00:39 PM PST by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Deathcare...a solution desperately looking for a problem.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
10 posted on
02/08/2010 4:03:13 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
So what do they want? More ‘donations’ from Carol Browner?
13 posted on
02/08/2010 4:06:12 PM PST by
UCANSEE2
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Peterson, Skelton and Pomeroy must feel their political careers in jeopardy come November.
17 posted on
02/08/2010 4:14:46 PM PST by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
“Earl Pomeroy (D-N.D.) has a bill that would keep the EPA from regulating greenhouse gases at all unless approved by Congress.”
Here's catch, Dems want the CO2 Cap And Trade First. If they are serious, congress would declare CO2 a non pollutant.
27 posted on
02/08/2010 6:33:24 PM PST by
steveab
(When was the last time someone tried to sell you a CO2 induced climate control system for your home?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson