Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehring

Stop with the 10th amendment already unless they are willing to disable the IRS in their states. There is no 10th as long as you cannot control the outflow.


4 posted on 02/09/2010 4:53:06 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Goreknowshowtocheat

>>Stop with the 10th amendment already unless they are willing to disable the IRS in their states. There is no 10th as long as you cannot control the outflow.<<

Stopping the outflow is up to the person in the mirror. Stop looking for government - any level - to do what individuals must do for themselves.

BTW, if there is no 10th Amendment - or a need for it - repeal it. I welcome that fight.


20 posted on 02/10/2010 6:29:10 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

“There is no 10th as long as you cannot control the outflow.”

Don’t you think that may very well be discussed? I heard Colorado a few years back passed legislation reorganizing the manner in which federal taxes were collected in the state. ALL federal taxes, including income, were to be sent to a state escrow account, from which, the State then paid the federal government.

Too bad the governor vetoed it!


21 posted on 02/10/2010 6:42:46 AM PST by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY (It's the spending, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson