No, and I clearly said that in my post under the disclaimer. I am pointing out to the poster that he/she is being a hypocrite by condemning Medina as a some kind of kook when the person the poster campaigned for as late as 2008, Ron Paul, also questioned 9/11 and even went further saying he would throw his support behind Kucinich for an investigation into the "cover-up".
Bottom line...there are still legitimate questions about 9/11, to believe so and say so does not automatically make one a "truther", a "kook" or a "loon" as many are suggesting.
Bottom line...there are still legitimate questions about 9/11, to believe so and say so does not automatically make one a “truther”, a “kook” or a “loon” as many are suggesting.
*************************************************************
I agree...
Malkin questioned, too
http://townhall.com/columnists/MichelleMalkin/2002/03/08/just_wondering
I’ve read good questions but I certainly don’t buy the bomb thing in the towers or whatever. The crazy ROP folk flew those planes into the towers and killed thousands. There are still unanswered questions about Fort Hood, too.