To: SpinnerWebb
That would be clear if that is what she said. It isn’t. You can’t just crop the quotation wherever you see fit.
She said ...
“I don’t, I don’t have enough evidence there, Glenn.”
not ...
“I don’t. I don’t have enough evidence there, Glenn.” (which means I have a definite opinion but lack the evidence with which to form an opinion — and thus makes no sense) ...
or
“I don’t, I don’t. Have enough evidence there, Glenn.” (which means I can’t form a complete sentence ... and thus makes no sense).
Your “interpretation” is wrong. “Spinner Web” is a fitting handle — you’re spinning.
SnakeDoc
117 posted on
02/12/2010 10:38:22 AM PST by
SnakeDoctor
(When you've got them by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow.)
To: SnakeDoctor
youre spinning.
Sadly, no. You're buying into the media's spin of interpreting a comma into her sentence. She later came out and said that she believed the government had no involvement, because the media spun it out of control. Believe what you want. It's a free country... yet.
121 posted on
02/12/2010 10:45:09 AM PST by
SpinnerWebb
(mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves)
To: SnakeDoctor
I dont, I dont have enough evidence there, Glenn.She had a Shep Smith moment...merely repeated the first words of a sentence. Was not making a statement with the first, "I don't."
123 posted on
02/12/2010 10:53:53 AM PST by
lonestar
(Obama and his czars have turned Bush's "mess" into a national crisis!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson