[SpinnerWebb]

Here's a link to the original transcript. Read it yourself and draw your own conclusions about what she said. To me, she was asked directly if she thought the goverment was involved. She answered 'I don't. But I don't have my hands on any evidence one way or the other. I acknowledge some questions have been raised, and I am not privy to all the evidence to allow me to render a judgement.'

[Quickgun]

So, if her first two words were “I don’t” Then what’s the problem? And if her next statement was that she had no evidence one way or the other, It’s obvius to me she was trying to stay OUT of a trap.That question was only asked to entrap, anyway. If she would have simply said no, Beck could have asked her “Why do you believe that? Or he could have asked, “Do you believe Americans were really the first to set foot on the moon?” I think she saw it as a trick question, too, and just tried to steer around it. If I were being deposed by lawyers and asked that same question....

[editor-surveyor]

You altered the transcript!

She never even came close to saying no, so keep on spinning in the breeze!

[SnakeDoctor]

>> She answered ‘I don’t. But I don’t have my hands on any evidence one way or the other. I acknowledge some questions have been raised, and I am not privy to all the evidence to allow me to render a judgement.’

You doctored the transcript! That isn’t what she said. “I don’t” was not an independent sentence ... it was the beginning of “I don’t, I don’t have all of the evidence there, Glenn.”

********************
BECK — [...]”Here’s then let me be more frank and ask you the question: Do you believe the government was any way involved with the bringing down of the World Trade Centers on 9/11?”

MEDINA — “I don’t, I don’t have all of the evidence there, Glenn. So I don’t I’m not in a place, I have not been out publicly questioning that. I think some very good questions have been raised in that regard. There are some very good arguments, and I think the American people have not seen all of the evidence there. So I’ve not taken a position on that.”

BECK — “I think the people of America might think that might be a yes.”

MEDINA — “Well [...] I’m not going to take a position.”
***********************

SnakeDoc

[hennie pennie]

>>> "To me, she was asked directly if she thought the goverment was involved. She answered 'I don't. But I don't have my hands on any evidence one way or the other. I acknowledge some questions have been raised, and I am not privy to all the evidence to allow me to render a judgement.'" <<<<

Thanks, I was wondering what it was that got so many people on edge, it sounds to me like she was trying to waffle, that while SHE DIDN'T BELONG TO THE TRUTHERS, that she didn't feel that she could comment upon them because she didn't know enough.

That's giving the Truthers & Alex Jones' Conspiracy Theorists a free ride. Do you suppose she was trying to answer in such a way as to not offend anyone???

Pathetic.

[panthermom]

What is she talking about evidence either way? It sounds to me like she did not want to alienate anyone regardless of what she thought.

The only evidence I will ever need I saw with my own 2 eyes as the 1st tower was on fire and I watched the second tower hit. Also how does one explain PA and the Pentagon?

I am tired of politicians trying to please everyone. Say what you believe and go from there.