Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FrPR

If your point is that I am dismissing this page in history because I use the word disappointment, well, I disagree. If the stated intent of the mission was to recover the safe with the nuclear codes and protocols, and we didn’t get that safe, it was a disappointment. Did I say “failure”? Of course, not, it was a tremendous achievement, who could have ever believed we could pull such a thing off and see any success whatsoever? And yet we did! Amazing! But really, at what point is it not disappointing when you don’t achieve your primary objectives, no matter how impressive your attempt?


23 posted on 02/13/2010 10:41:41 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: pepsi_junkie; FrPR
I'll ammend that to say "unless we really did get the whole sub. Then it was an unprecedented success, a coup in fact!"

But since nobody will ever officially admit that we did get the whole thing, as outsiders looking in all that can be said is it's still amazing but officially a disappointment.

I'd like to think we got the whole boat though. That would be so cool, imagine walking the passageways of a soviet ghost sub at the height of the cold war!

24 posted on 02/13/2010 10:46:23 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson