Replies

“Just keep mashing the DONATE button!” ~ 1rudeboy

Isn’t THAT the truth. Looks to me as if she’s just an opportunist trying to get a piece of Berg’s action:

Big time DemocRAT Hillary Clinton supporter, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, was the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States

Berg said, “.... he has not proven that he is “Constitutionally eligible” to be President and ... Obama has not produced legal documents to show he legally changed his name from his ‘adopted’ name of ‘Barry Soetoro’ from Indonesia. I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in ‘our’ U.S.A., for ‘our’ forefathers and for the 3.2 million men and women that have died and/or been maimed defending our Constitution with our ‘Peaceful Revolution’ to prove that Obama is not Constitutionally qualified/eligible to be President. “I still have cases pending in the Federal Courts. Go to obamacrimes.com to see the status of each case.” http://obamacrimes.com/

...since a DemocRAT was the first “Birther”, I’m quite content to allow the ‘RATS to own the issue.

23 posted on Thursday, July 30, 2009 8:28:12 PM by Matchett-PI http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2304853/posts?page=23#23

July 29, 2009
Suborned in the U.S.A.
The birth-certificate controversy is about Obama’s honesty, not where he was born.
By Andrew C. McCarthy
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZmJhMzlmZWFhOTQ3YjUxMDE2YWY4ZDMzZjZlYTVmZmU=&w=MA

July 30, 2009
Obama’s birth certificate and the real issues
Thomas Lifson
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/07/obamas_birth_certificate_and_t.html

I doff my cap and bow low to Andrew McCarthy of National Review Online, who has produced essential reading for anyone wondering what to think about the birther controversy rocking the right, and now breaking into the mainstream media, which sees an opportunity to mock and discredit the right.

He and I agree: the entire Kenyan birth theory is a distraction, and a useful tool in the hands of Alinskyites on the ridicule and destroy mission. But before moving on to other significant issues, McCarthy acknowledges that NRO’s editorial yesterday accidentally mischaracterized the nature of the documentation that is available from Hawaii. He writes:

The information in the certification may be identical as far as it goes to what’s in the complete state records, but there are evidently many more details in the state records than are set forth in the certification. Contrary to the editors’ description, those who want to see the full state record - the certificate or the so-called “vault copy” - are not on a wild-goose chase for a “secondary document cloaked in darkness.” That confuses their motives (which vary) with what they’ve actually requested (which is entirely reasonable). Regardless of why people may want to see the vault copy, what’s been requested is a primary document that is materially more detailed than what Obama has thus far provided.

McCarthy then lays out the real issue: Obama’s extraordinary secrecy, amounting to a scrubbing of his paper trail, combined with his demonstrated record of lying about his past. Obama is a phony, though and through. A former assistant US Attorney, McCarthy economically but methodically assembles the evidence, including sources, that Obama has presented a false story of his life. He lists a startling number of lies about his life story, with documentation. [snip] Continue at above link.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2304853/posts?page=36#36