"I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of 3 branches of the government working for them, and that ain't bad."
From a criminal recidivism point of view he is right it isn’t that bad. From a POW point of view it is obscene and pointless to release these men only to have them continue to strike against us. Is the war on terror a proper war or is it a law enforcement idea like the war on drugs?
Unless that “one” is the one who kills your son or daughter, spouse or parent.
Mindless morons . . . gonna’ get us all killed . . . what a bunch of out-of-touch screwballs! Only 20% . . . Hope they use that as a “re-election” bumper sticker slogan.
Lord A’Mighty, Colonel? What the, Ah Say, what the hell’s going on here?
Captured enemy combatants ought never be repatriated during wartime, nor is there any international requirement that they be. Do they deserve to be treated humanely? Yes. Do we owe them the same legal treatment one would accord US citizens accused of crimes, no matter how heinous? No.
To even suggest otherwise is, in the present context, to deny the fundamental nature of Al Qaeda, of the Taliban and of the other groups fighting a Radical Islamic war against the West, of which the United States is their primary target.
That any of the foregoing is not immediately self-evident to our government leaders is more than troubling.
Easy for Brennan and 0bamao’s regime to say - none of them have faced al queda in combat.
Let me know if you'd like to be on or off the ping list
Resign or be fired.
So Hussein can replace you with someone worse but who knows how to keep his mouth shut.
This is top down traitorous incompetence.
The America hating law student, with the security clearance, claimed he and his professor thought the statement by the former administration of fifty released Gitmo detainees returning to extremism was greatly inflated. The actual number being less than half a dozen. He said he was the head of the Guantanamo Litigation Project. He and his professor were pushing the close of Gitmo.
Now, at the statement of 580 total releases between both administratons by Brennan and a recidivism rate of 20% with about 10% actually involved in terrorism with the other 10% involved with extremism, that gives about 58 actual terrorists and 116 or so pushing terrorism in total.
Do you think the professor and the America hating student will now disband their project, admit the Bush Administration was correct, and apologize for being wrong? Or do you think they will simply bury this and move on with their anti-American activities?
Yea, it was a rhetorical question. I didn't make it to Brennan's answer when the next question came from a CAIR rep who wanted to know what the government was going to do to make Muslims feel good about living in the US since 9/11, since they weren't happy anymore. Couldn't even stand to hear Brennan's answer on that. It was enough.
What a rat's nest NYU is.
I don’t see this as any different from the results the libs are happy with from their other programs.
As they were flying into their the destination ("YEE-HAA,just like effin' Viet Nam!") the white Johnson asked the black Johnson, what would be the estimated civilian casuality cost. The white Johnson said, "20%", which prompted the black Johnson to reply,after a somewhat pregnant pause, "I can live with that!"
Oh no...No, it isn't...Of course not...Unless that 20% goes on to KILL INNOCENT CIVILIANS AND/OR AMERICAN TROOPS, you twit.
Brennan not fired yet?!
An astounding fact:
100% of executed terrorists were never again found being terrorists. Their recidivism rate was 0%.
Thus, we learn that bullets cure terrorism recidivism.
Sufficient waterboarding can, as well.
One out of five BEING CAUGHT again in the fight is pretty bad. It's even worse for those who are killed by them before they are recaptured in our catch-and-release program, or hopefully killed by our soldiers.
"I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of 3 branches of the government working for them, and that ain't bad."