Posted on 02/16/2010 8:10:38 AM PST by rabscuttle385
Still using that old Univision interview, huh? Nevermind she’s clarifieed herself several times since.
Such sophomoric crap, something only an undergrad might believe.
The same people, mindlessly beating the same drum. sometimes it’s hard to comprehend.
Actually, it does. Because if the Tea Party becomes defined by truthers, birthers, etc., one, the MSM (as it already has) will paint it as a bunch of loons, and two- that characterization will NEVER gain more members.
He should be called, ‘RecycleRabs’.
I'm curious, do you, as does Ron Paul, believe that the United States of America was the root cause of 9-11?
We've all figured you out by now. Your posting history has narrowed down to 2 subjects only....anti McCain and anti Palin, thus causing you to be irrelevant.
You really should broaden your horizons a little and maybe post an article or two about Obama or Rahm. Now that would be an interesting change up, but one in which I don't think you're capable of doing.
Hunter is a total nut case!
I thought that we wern’t supposed to post his crap here?
LOLOL! That's so perfect! Now all need to do is come up with a catchy name for his 4 fellow followers that he pings to all his recycled threads!
The more the threads against Sarah Palin does not make the attacks the truth.
Fringe sources especially, Truthers and anti war, loons
show a desperate person.
Gang of four is catchy though........
:-)
Well well, I see the anti-liberty Libertarians are still hard on in bashing Mrs. Palin.
Little wonder Paulies couldn’t get their boy to move beyond single digit support in real polls.
Jack Hunter needs to get a life.
Paul is going nowhere and just may be soon out of his seat as well.
You know what they say about arguing with whack-a-doodles, rabs.
And what's your point?
Care to find the post where I said that the U.S. government perpetrated the 9/11 attacks (i.e., the "Truther" conspiracy)?
Or am I just guilty by association (as mnehring claims at post 58)?
Because what ALL (CAluvdubya, post 66; rintense, posts 55, 64, 65; dirtboy, post 56; lakeshark, posts 62, 63; mnehring, post 58) have done thus far is simply attack me ad hominem, something that usually indicates that you really have no argument, or in other words, either all of you are mentally devoid or intellectually lazy (hence the need to fling mud from the start) or maybe just brainwashed.
Your posting history has narrowed down to 2 subjects only....anti McCain and anti Palin, thus causing you to be irrelevant.
And what's wrong with being anti-McCain? He is, after all, a RINO who is numero uno when it comes to campaign finance "reform" (muzzling conservatives), amnesty (one law for the sheep, another for the oxen), and cap-and-tax, and that's not even counting the fact that he voted yea on the fascist bailouts.
If being anti-RINO is "irrelevant" (CAluvdubya, post 66) then the entire Tea Party movement is "irrelevant"--and of course this lends credence to Mr. Hunter's claim in the original post that
real conservative toughness might require a real questioning of government at all levels. Unfortunately, conservatives whose attachment to the warfare state remains every bit as passionate as liberals attachment to the welfare state, continue to prove they have no serious intention of dismantling big governmentonly making noise about it.
As for Palin, I'll agree on this one with Sam Wurzelbacher aka Joe the Plumber, who's angry with Palin for going off and supporting the RINO McCain (nevermind my beef with her PAC's financial support for the RINOs Murkowski and Graham).
Those weren’t definitive anti-amnesty statements. McCain and Obama are against amnesty.
They are enforceable. The only thing lacking is the will.
It is, however, posssible to modify the laws to identify qualified individual who would be a benefit to the country, value the opportunity presented to them and are willing to make an enforceable commitment to be law abiding, tax paying, English speaking residents of the United States. Isn't that really the end goal?
No, the end goal is the rule of law and protection of our sovereignty. We bring in 1.2 million LEGAL IMMIGRANTS A YEAR and there are millions more waiting their turn overseas who have completed all of the paperwork. Rewarding people who have entered our country illegally by allowing them to stay and work here is unfair and just invites more illegals to come. We tried a "one-time" amnesty in 1986. It doesn't work.
It is interesting to note that in the past week, Joe the Plummer and Michelle Malkin have both been critical of Palin. Both were previously revered by most FReepers. Now they are ridiculed ;-)
The Democrats have their Obama, and now, the Republicans have their Palin.
A merit based immigration system that brings in the skills and talents to keep us competitive in the global economy;
Reduced immigration levels based on need and more closely approximating 500,000 immigrants a year recommended by the Jordan Commission;
Elimination of extended chain migration, i.e., family reunification, limiting it to the nuclear family;<./p>
Enforcement of existing immigration laws to reduce the current illegal alien population and limit future illegal immigration, i.e., attrition thru enforcement. Enforcement would include: (1) ending the job magnet; (2) increasing coordination at the federal level by eliminating barriers to information sharing among agencies; (3) leveraging state and local enforcement resources; (4) fully implementing the US-VISIT Program to track and deport visa overstays; and (5) make mandatory and improve such programs as E-Verify and 287 [g] authority to assist employers and law enforcement in identifying illegal aliens;
Elimination of birthright citizenship;
Ensure that anyone who enters this nation illegally is not rewarded by being permitted to stay and work here; i.e., no amnesty;
Streamline the processing and adjudication of immigration cases; and
Promote pro-immigrant measures that help newcomers assimilate and embrace the values and principles of our Founders and the Constitution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.