Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Economic Equivalent Of War [Hank Paulson has a book out]
Forbes ^ | 02.16.10, 05:55 PM EST | Robert Lenzner

Posted on 02/16/2010 5:08:43 PM PST by 1rudeboy

Hank Paulson tells how he brought us back from the brink of financial collapse by bending the rules of the free market.

Stop sniping at Hank Paulson. The former Treasury Secretary saved the day by overcoming his predilection for free market capitalism and he didn't do it to save Goldman Sachs, his and my alma mater. His pragmatic boldness helped save the capitalist system from a possible total collapse.

Read On The Brink, Inside the Race to Stop the Collapse of the Global Financial System (Business Plus, $28.99) and get Paulson's take on the whole affair. The facts are these: In the six months between March and September of 2008, eight major financial institutions--Bear Stearns, IndyMac, Fannie Mae ( FNM - news - people ), Freddie Mac ( FRE - news - people ), Lehman Brothers ( LEHMQ - news - people ), AIG ( AIG - news - people ), Wash Mutual and Wachovia--went under or had to be rescued in costly fashion. Citigroup ( C - news - people ) was insolvent; Bank of America ( BAC - news - people ), Goldman Sachs ( GS - news - people ), and Morgan Stanley ( MS - news - people ) were on the edge for a while.

I was mentally exhausted trying to keep straight these cumulative crises all these many months later. There was no time to catch a breath.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: bookdeals; goldmansachs; hankpaulson; lenzner; onthebrink; paulson; robertlenzner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Virginia Ridgerunner

What was he doing on his knees? You sure it was him?


21 posted on 02/16/2010 5:43:18 PM PST by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

You may be ultimately proven correct. I won’t read the book for a couple months, myself. (I usually don’t make up my mind before learning what happened).


22 posted on 02/16/2010 5:43:44 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Harvard, Columbia....looks like we need to avoid those two.


23 posted on 02/16/2010 5:44:40 PM PST by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Talks Implode During a Day of Chaos; Fate of Bailout Plan Remains Unresolved

"Thursday, in the Roosevelt Room after the session, the Treasury secretary, Henry M. Paulson Jr., literally bent down on one knee as he pleaded with Nancy Pelosi, the House Speaker, not to “blow it up” by withdrawing her party’s support for the package over what Ms. Pelosi derided as a Republican betrayal."

24 posted on 02/16/2010 5:48:19 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All
Bill Fleckenstein has a couple of books he recommends (you can refuse to read them also, and become true experts). He recommends his own book, also, but he writes for MSN Money, so he is automatically suspect and can be ignored also (/sarc):

Ron Paul, End the Fed.
Bill Fleckenstein, Greenspan's Bubbles: The Age of Recklessness at the Federal Reserve.
Barry Ritholtz, Bailout Nation.
William Cohan, House of Cards: A Tale of Hubris and Wretched Excess on Wall Street.
Patrick Robinson, A Colossal Failure of Common Sense:The Inside Story of the Collapse of Lehman Brothers.
Charles Gasparino, The Sellout: How Three Decades of Wall Street Greed and Government Mismanagement Destroyed the Global Financial System.

He recommends Gasparino the most. I recommend, Thomas Sowell's, The Housing Boom and Bust.
25 posted on 02/16/2010 5:54:54 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

““I ain’t one fer no fancy book-lernin.’””

Perhaps we view his academic background as long on name and short on substance.


26 posted on 02/16/2010 6:08:43 PM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center

If you haven’t gathered the larger point that I’m trying to make, then I will simply repeat, “short on substance” is something that is easy to prove, as well as assume.


27 posted on 02/16/2010 6:11:43 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
“If you haven’t gathered the larger point that I’m trying to make, then I will simply repeat, “short on substance” is something that is easy to prove, as well as assume.”

Perhaps you've missed my point: a degree from a prestigious university is no actual proof you had any appropriate or useful “book lernin”. It means you have a checkbook and could pass a test. Little more.

It's not as if his field (Paulson's) was particularly rigorous. He just has an MBA.

28 posted on 02/16/2010 6:17:07 PM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

paulson hearts obama

Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman Sachs chairman, told him that Goldman would be “next” if speculators succeeded in bringing down Morgan Stanley, the former Treasury secretary said.

“If they go, we’re next,” Mr Blankfein told Mr Paulson, a former Goldman chairman who had recused himself from decisions relating to his former company.

US officials explored the possibility of mergers between JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley, Goldman and Citigroup, or Goldman and Wachovia, before settling on turning Morgan Stanley and Goldman into banks with access to central bank loans.

Even then, Morgan Stanley was not safe until the US Treasury helped seal an investment by Japan’s Mitsubishi UFJ, Mr Paulson writes.

The frenzied manoeuvring came in the three-week period between the failure of Lehman on September 15 2008, and Columbus Day weekend in early October, when the global financial system was on the verge of meltdown.

“Banks were going down like flies,” Mr Paulson told the FT. As his book details, he was scrambling to secure Tarp bail-out funds from Congress.

“The timing could not have been worse since we were months or weeks from the election so you had the collision of markets and politics.”

Although a Republican, Mr Paulson found it harder to deal with John McCain than Barack Obama – raising the interesting (and unanswered) question of which candidate Mr Paulson voted for.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/772748d6-0e94-11df-bd79-00144feabdc0.html


29 posted on 02/16/2010 6:21:05 PM PST by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center
Perhaps you've missed my point: a degree from a prestigious university is no actual proof you had any appropriate or useful “book lernin”. It means you have a checkbook and could pass a test. Little more.

I was afraid that it was your point, actually. You appear to be arguing that Paulson claims in his book (that I haven't read) that people should listen to him because he graduated from an Ivy League School.

I should add that no one that I can see is doing anything of the kind, much less Paulson himself, but there is no shortage of people arguing that we should not listen to him for the same reason.

30 posted on 02/16/2010 6:24:50 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

That may be true. Now why shouldn’t I read his book, again?


31 posted on 02/16/2010 6:26:39 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
“I was afraid that it was your point, actually. You appear to be arguing that Paulson claims in his book (that I haven't read) that people should listen to him because he graduated from an Ivy League School.”

I presume that he thinks people should listen to him because he was SecTreas. I was replying to your “don't need no book lernin’” line.

“I should add that no one that I can see is doing anything of the kind, much less Paulson himself, but there is no shortage of people arguing that we should not listen to him for the same reason.”

Best I can tell, he's a liar and a thief, albeit “legally”. So, that is one reason not to listen to him. Perhaps, after the audit, he'll be indicted.

32 posted on 02/16/2010 6:30:11 PM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center
Best I can tell, he's a liar and a thief, albeit “legally”. So, that is one reason not to listen to him. Perhaps, after the audit, he'll be indicted.

I'm just trying to get a handle on how someone can express a desire to see someone "indicted" while expressing no desire to hear that person express their side of the story. Never mind, I just got a handle on it. Burn him with fire.

33 posted on 02/16/2010 6:34:20 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
Although a Republican, Mr Paulson...

Paulson was a Republican???!!!

A self-serving RINO, then. Hardly a conservative.

34 posted on 02/16/2010 6:46:17 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

“I’m just trying to get a handle on how someone can express a desire to see someone “indicted” while expressing no desire to hear that person express their side of the story.”

Because I don’t expect it to be anything other than spin.

Everyone is innocent in prison, after all.


35 posted on 02/16/2010 7:02:10 PM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Good evening.

When you are finished with Paulson's book, tell me the answer to these questions (I'm lazy, and probably won't read the book):

Who were the people/governments that were able to take half a trillion dollars out of circulation within a 36 hour period? And how did they do it?

Thanking you in advance...

5.56mm

36 posted on 02/16/2010 7:02:23 PM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: okie01

“A self-serving RINO, then. Hardly a conservative.”

There were only a handful of conservatives in the Bush Admin. I can only think of Bolton, Ashrcroft, and maybe Cheney.


37 posted on 02/16/2010 7:03:38 PM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center
Everyone is innocent in prison, after all.

Last time I checked, before someone gets tossed in prison there usually is a trial.

38 posted on 02/16/2010 7:04:28 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

I haven’t heard of that . . . if anything, I thought that the Fed flooded the system with dollars . . . .


39 posted on 02/16/2010 7:05:58 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

“Last time I checked, before someone gets tossed in prison there usually is a trial.”

Missin’ the point again, I see. OK... How about this:

“Everyone on trial is innocent”.


40 posted on 02/16/2010 7:15:05 PM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson