To: granite
The US. Supreme Court ruled in Michigan v. Sitz that although a DUI roadblock does constitute a violation of the Fourth Amendment, the governmentalal interest in reducing drunk driving fatalities outweighs the "minimal intrusion" into a citizen’s constitutional rights.
There is a special place in he@@ waiting for those in SCOTUS that supported this ruling.
To: microgood
The US. Supreme Court ruled (your state) that seizing all private firearms does constitute a violation of the second a,endment,
the governmental interest in reducing accidental shootings outweighs the “minimal intrusion” into a citizen’s constitutional rights.
20 posted on
02/17/2010 8:42:16 AM PST by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
To: microgood
There is a special place in he@@ waiting for those in SCOTUS that supported this ruling.That would be Rehnquist, Scalia, White, O'Connor, Kennedy and Blackmun.
55 posted on
02/17/2010 9:29:00 AM PST by
Bubba Ho-Tep
("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
To: microgood; granite; bamahead
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson