Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bubba Ho-Tep; ForGod'sSake
“It did provide the court with the one case on the matter, Texas v. White. And as much at the Lost Causers will cry that it's a bad decision because of X, Y, and Z, it's still a US Supreme Court decision.”

How about Penhallow v. Doane?

Majority of that Court held ( secession was legal )

204 posted on 02/17/2010 4:41:25 PM PST by Idabilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: Idabilly

Well, no. Not really. First off, Penhallow concerned events before the Constitution was ratified. Before, even, the Articles of Confederation. It concerned events which took place under the Continental Congress. If New Hampshire had wanted to withdraw from that, they certainly could have. But having not withdrawn, they were subject to the courts’ authority.


210 posted on 02/17/2010 5:24:12 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson