Not necessarily. A Google search of the phrase reveals that it has showed up from time to time on various discussion boards. Who knows where he picked it up from.
It is now, but if you remove all of today’s references, it becomes more obscure. Also, his whole train of thought seems to follow Fairlie.
People will read what they want to into this guy’s last screed. Does he mention a Communist rule? He must be a Communist! Does he hate taxes? He must be a Paulite! Does he mention the Catholic Church? He must be an anti-PapistI Does he mention Big Capital? He must be a Libertarian!
One thing is certain: he hated the IRS.
All the rest - trying to pigeonhole him into various categories - is contradicted by his statement. He was anti-everything, aggrieved and insanely furious. He killed himself and someone else. He left a family behind - though apparently he was mad at them as well.
The people here who think he’s a Communist will not be swayed by any argument or close reading of his own writing. He probably would have been happy to take a poke in the nose at them on that point and found lots to agree with them on other opinions.
His ideas were a mishmash of stuff he picked up from a variety of places, and which he subscribed to because they matched his pre-conceived grievances. That’s very common.
People will read what they want to into this guy’s last screed. Does he mention a Communist rule? He must be a Communist! Does he hate taxes? He must be a Paulite! Does he mention the Catholic Church? He must be an anti-PapistI Does he mention Big Capital? He must be a Libertarian!
One thing is certain: he hated the IRS.
All the rest - trying to pigeonhole him into various categories - is contradicted by his statement. He was anti-everything, aggrieved and insanely furious. He killed himself and someone else. He left a family behind - though apparently he was mad at them as well.
The people here who think he’s a Communist will not be swayed by any argument or close reading of his own writing. He probably would have been happy to take a poke in the nose at them on that point and found lots to agree with them on other opinions.
His ideas were a mishmash of stuff he picked up from a variety of places, and which he subscribed to because they matched his pre-conceived grievances. That’s very common.
People will read what they want to into this guy’s last screed. Does he mention a Communist rule? He must be a Communist! Does he hate taxes? He must be a Paulite! Does he mention the Catholic Church? He must be an anti-PapistI Does he mention Big Capital? He must be a Libertarian!
One thing is certain: he hated the IRS.
All the rest - trying to pigeonhole him into various categories - is contradicted by his statement. He was anti-everything, aggrieved and insanely furious. He killed himself and someone else. He left a family behind - though apparently he was mad at them as well.
The people here who think he’s a Communist will not be swayed by any argument or close reading of his own writing. He probably would have been happy to take a poke in the nose at them on that point and found lots to agree with them on other opinions.
His ideas were a mishmash of stuff he picked up from a variety of places, and which he subscribed to because they matched his pre-conceived grievances. That’s very common.