Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kfobbs

A 2200lb. manned projectile hurtling along at 60+mph is itself inherently dangrous. Any distraction to the operator of said projectile can only increase that danger IMO. However, the libertarian in me still opposes any attempt at legally banning those distractions. A Government that will use the force of law to protect the individual from the consequences of his actions is encroaching on that individual’s liberty, and can only result in further encroachments in the future. It is up to each individual to recognize the potential consequences of our actions and to take steps, through common sense and good judgement, to minimize risk. Many will not. And many will pay dearly for it. I believe this is the price of freedom.


50 posted on 02/19/2010 7:08:47 AM PST by SkiKnee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SkiKnee
Here's an interesting thought . . .

From a legislative standpoint, I believe the most effective way to improve traffic safety would be to outlaw automatic transmissions, power steering and power brakes.

One big reason why people often drive in such a distracted state is that the design of a modern vehicle makes it easy for them to do it. You never would have seen this kind of nonsense when driving a car meant driving a car instead of sitting in a miniature living room with giant windows and a modern entertainment system.

59 posted on 02/19/2010 7:17:37 AM PST by Alberta's Child (God is great, beer is good . . . and people are crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson