If you go back to her website, she not only shows her original source, you’ll find that the source responds in the Comments section to people questioning him.
She named the exact school where the documents came from. GB didn’t. GB just presented the documents in a generic way.
The parent of the involved student has his real name on the website. GB never mentioned him or the kid, for that matter.
P. Geller cited the names, and produced the documents they sent her; and then they consented to respond on her site. GB did none of these; he simply grabbed P. Geller’s documents off her site and presented the information as his own.
The reason we focus on the messenger, is that if the messenger is a fraud....perhaps so is the message.
And I think we concervatives should be concerned about tying ourselves to a fraud. Because he’ll take us down, too. He’s got NOTHING to lose.
Uh, he presented them before she did, according to the date on your link. I don't recall if Glenn named the school or not but any one who named parents or students name is a blithering idiot.
Talk about opening yourself up for a liability law suite.
What she does and what Gelnn does are two wholly different things. She doesn't have time limitations so she can be much more thorough in her presentations. Like I said earlier, if you have to cite every source every time you utter something, you would never get anything said.
BTW, I saw no source citations there, not to say they aren't but I didn't see them.
Glenn presents a plethora of information forom numerous sources. It serves no purpose to spend the time naming them all when time is of the essence.
Focus on the message instead of trying to tear everything apart and nitpicking everything to death, you'll be much more successful that way and maybe, just maybe we'll make some progress in returning our Country to it's foundations.
In other words, don't sweat the small stuff.