Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Former Military Chick

Thursday, February 11, 2010

“High Road Contracting Policy” Could Change How Government Contractors Compensate Their Employees

According to an article posted on the DC Crawler website

http://dailycaller.com/2010/02/04/white-house-considers-pro-labor-policy-for-government-contractors/

, the “Obama administration is considering a proposal that would heavily favor government contractors that implement policies designed by organized labor.”

Under current policy, government contracts are awarded based on an analysis of price, past performance, and the ability to meet the contract’s specific requirements. The proposal, dubbed the “High Road Contracting Policy,” would give preference to labor-friendly contractors that provide its workers with wages and benefits over and above what is required under existing laws. Specifically, a procurement preference would be given to employers that provide its workers with a “living” wage, to include, at a minimum, health insurance, employer-funded retirement plan, and paid sick days. Contractors found to have violated labor laws would be restricted, and possibly barred, from being awarded federal contracts.

The Department of Labor would be responsible for examining the labor records of federal contractors, giving it unprecedented power and influence over the federal procurement process.

Critics contend that the proposal would introduce an arbitrary variable into the procurement process and raise the price tag on federal contracts. Stay tuned.


7 posted on 02/23/2010 2:04:10 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kcvl

RE: “Under current policy, government contracts are awarded based on an analysis of price, past performance, and the ability to meet the contract’s specific requirements.”

ahem... let us not forget that GOV, DOD, and the SBA give preference and in some cases set asides to minority owned businesses. Taking tax payer monies and redistributing it versus simply cutting taxes tends to by default favor subsidizing affirmative action intiatives more than it does economic recovery premised upon capitalist principles...


33 posted on 02/23/2010 10:11:11 PM PST by DBeers ( †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson