Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patlin

Oh, and BTW, your sources ain’t that hot. Yinger does less analyses by far of the Framers’ intent than the WKA Court. The “Story” treatise is N/A since Story was discussed in WKA. Heritage, wouldn’t have to worry about birthright law impact, unless birthright applied. Which it does. And which is in that wiki link you find so funny. Jstor won’t let me past the first page. I typically try to read further than that. The immigration investigation thing is weird to me somehow.

parsy, who did look


118 posted on 02/25/2010 11:02:27 AM PST by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: parsifal
Yinger’s work only educates one by how much time one spends studying his sources.

You obviously don't care to take the time to assert any individual freedom or free thinking by doing so.

Nope, you are nothing more than a drone who regurgitates lies spread by your commander, the washed up traffic law clerk.

123 posted on 02/25/2010 11:34:19 AM PST by patlin (1st SCOTUS of USA: "Human life, from its commencement to its close, is protected by the common law.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson