I need a better explanation since I don’t trust O.
Same here Carley....Only think I can think is that the GOP wanted to be able to say that they are not the party of NO and coopertated on a facet they thought needed redone, but didn’t want to support it 100%, so they designated certain “safe” seats to vote yea.....
I just hope each individual Rep wears a wire and catches O underhanded threats and promises.
Indeed. The concept seems acceptable enough, but we need some commentary from those intimately familiar with the ramifications before we understand their real motive.