[big'ol_freeper]

You’re full of shit. He’s a liberal. Why would conservatives support him. Whether people don’t support him because of his religion or not, ultimately he could be a Evangelical and conservatives still would not support him because he is an F-ing liberal.

[onyx]

Don’t you dare swear at me!

You’re ignorant to think his religion is not a huge impediment. He was forced to make a major speech about it in ‘08.

[ejonesie22]

Actaully it's a little bit of his religion and hell of a lot of his fake smile and liberal tendencies...

I don't which one a person picks to oppose him on as long as he gets kicked to the curb, but his politics are more then sufficient for a Conservative to oppose him on.

[SoCalPol]

>He’s a liberal. Why would conservatives support him>

For the same reason many on FR support the
NeoLeftist, Anti War, 9/11 Truther Ron Paul and
Medina in Tex.

[rabscuttle385]

You’re full of shit. He’s a liberal. Why would conservatives support him. Whether people don’t support him because of his religion or not, ultimately he could be a Evangelical and conservatives still would not support him because he is an F-ing liberal.

Anyone who bases their support (or non-support) of a candidate on the candidate's religion is full of sh-t.

As for Romney, I'll agree with big'ol_freeper. I can't support Romney based on his record of flaming progressivism. Romney's religion is irrelevant to me.