1 posted on
03/02/2010 11:48:55 AM PST by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
Can’t really say it leads to less crime, but it certainly didn’t lead to more.
2 posted on
03/02/2010 11:51:49 AM PST by
Grut
To: jazusamo
When asked to comment, your local leftist replied
3 posted on
03/02/2010 11:54:09 AM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: jazusamo
5 posted on
03/02/2010 12:10:38 PM PST by
IrishCatholic
(No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
To: jazusamo
It amazes me that this simple fact is impossible for the antigunners to grasp. They’re as bad as Algore is on “global warming”. River in Egypt, etc.
To: jazusamo
The SC should only be considering the constitutionality of the issue not the crime rate statistics.
7 posted on
03/02/2010 12:33:17 PM PST by
Hacklehead
(Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
To: jazusamo
Wasn’t there a little Southern town or county that was beset by crime -— until the gun laws changed? Presto — the crime rate dropped and went to nearby towns/counties.
Work’s every time!
10 posted on
03/02/2010 12:42:17 PM PST by
Exit148
(Loose Change Founder. A little goes a long way!)
To: jazusamo
Crime, like poverty, makes the populace more dependent on government. That’s why the liberals like it so much.
13 posted on
03/02/2010 1:12:23 PM PST by
Spok
(Free Range Republican)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson