To: JoSixChip
Well, let’s start with there being something worth remembering about the man or event.
A celebrity killed his wife, and his lawyer was clever enough to confuse the jury enough to let him off. So? Nothing worth remembering, certainly not his suit.
To: ctdonath2
clever enough to confuse the jury enough to let him off
Don't forget the crucial role played by the incompetent star-struck judge, who allowed the defense to present a conspiracy theory with exactly zero evidence to back it up.
(A competent judge would have asked OJ's defense to present convincing evidence of the conspiracy - then getting none, would have explicitly banned any further mention of said alleged conspiracy. Oh well, this is what happens when you put idiots in charge.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson