Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AG to sue Bowl Championship Series
Legal Newsline ^ | 3-2-09 | Chris Rizo

Posted on 03/02/2010 2:37:13 PM PST by legalwatch

WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline)-Big legal troubles could be in store for the college football playoff system that the Utah attorney general says disadvantages his and other states.

(Excerpt) Read more at legalnewsline.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: bcs; collegefootball; football; ncaa; shurtleff; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 03/02/2010 2:37:13 PM PST by legalwatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: legalwatch

Sorry, I know it pisses a lot of folks off, but I support legal action against the BCS.


2 posted on 03/02/2010 2:38:51 PM PST by TitansAFC (The Left does not devote so much effort into attacking Sarah Palin because she's a weak candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: legalwatch

You are telling me that there aren’t REAL crimes out there that would justify this guys pay check???


3 posted on 03/02/2010 2:40:38 PM PST by Mr. Jazzy ("I AM JIM THOMPSON and moderates make me PUKE!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: legalwatch

Hurrah! Let’s destroy the entire bowl season because a couple teams no longer like the rules they agreed to.


4 posted on 03/02/2010 2:40:43 PM PST by Ingtar (Reckon the process will be silly - Reckonsilliation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

It’s worth noting that the state’s attorney general is taking this action, not the University of Utah itself. I wonder what that means in terms of legal standing, contractual matters between the school and the NCAA, etc.


5 posted on 03/02/2010 2:44:07 PM PST by Alberta's Child (God is great, beer is good . . . and people are crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

I don’t think the non-BCS conferences agreed to anything other than getting shafted by those desiring to maintain the status quo versus crowning a true champion.


6 posted on 03/02/2010 2:44:10 PM PST by The Iceman Cometh (0bama is my President...and he's out to get me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jazzy

-—”You are telling me that there aren’t REAL crimes out there that would justify this guys pay check???”—

Dude, it’s Utah. This IS the biggest crime in the state. LOL


7 posted on 03/02/2010 2:51:27 PM PST by TitansAFC (The Left does not devote so much effort into attacking Sarah Palin because she's a weak candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: legalwatch
Let's see, the country is collapsing into debt, money is being starved from the free-market side of the economy in favor of the tax-mandated governmental side...

...and these guys want us to employ legal teams to go after a football-game arrangement...

...and they're REPUBLICANS?!?

8 posted on 03/02/2010 2:58:33 PM PST by Yossarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
Someone should counter sue these MWC and WAC loving clowns and force them to play big boy schedules.

Besides, the Utes didn't do squat last year and missed out on no BCS opportunities.

If the ambulance chaser is trying to rehash beating Alabama two years ago, I believe they call that a fluke. No one sane going in thought that UU was a title contender heading for some consolation match in New Orleans.
9 posted on 03/02/2010 3:00:06 PM PST by Goldsborough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: legalwatch
Just when you thought that you had seen it all, Utah AG wants to sue the BCS. With all the serious problems in the world, do we really need litigation about a sport, which is nothing more than entertainment. If Utah does not like the BCS, start your own championship bowl. Create a trophy and some rings and reward it to yourself.
10 posted on 03/02/2010 3:03:33 PM PST by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Since when is it wrong to seek to change rules that you don’t like?


11 posted on 03/02/2010 3:04:08 PM PST by Comstock1 (You can't have Falstaff and have him thin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

HAHAHAHA!!!

You are correct, sir!

HIIIIOOOOOO!


12 posted on 03/02/2010 3:04:44 PM PST by Mr. Jazzy ("I AM JIM THOMPSON and moderates make me PUKE!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Goldsborough
Playoff System for college football. Here's what needs to happen:

Once conference champions are crowned (first weekend after Thanksgiving), the top 16 teams are selected. Over the next 2 weekends, the top 4 teams are determined (#1 vs. #16, #2 vs. #15, ... #8 vs. #9). All losers, plus the other "bowl-eligible" teams are then relegated to lesser bowl games for the rest of the month.

Starting New Year's weekend, the top 4 square off for 3 final games in the "big" bowl games.

That's how it should be done - it would include all conferences regardless of 'quality' and nobody can complain for being left out. Harrumph.

13 posted on 03/02/2010 3:20:31 PM PST by alancarp (Calling all states: Reduce the cost of doing business and jobs will flock to your doors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Comstock1
Since when is it wrong to seek to change rules that you don’t like?

Attorney Generals enforce law. Law that applies, involuntarily, over all of the occupants of a state or nation.

The BCS is a voluntary association with rules.

Involuntary law ≠ voluntary rules.

Case closed.

14 posted on 03/02/2010 3:51:23 PM PST by Yossarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

Maybe if the lawyer can somehow crowbar Obama’s citizenship issue into this it could get some legs.


15 posted on 03/02/2010 4:13:26 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear (These fragments I have shored against my ruins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Sorry, I know it pisses a lot of folks off, but I support legal action against the BCS.

The BCS is one of the most corrupt institutions in the world and there is a pile of money at stake, it's amazing that they been able to get away with the con for so long.

16 posted on 03/02/2010 4:16:30 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

The NCAA is prohibited from violating laws of the US and of the various states. If the AG of a particular state believes that implementation of NCAA (in this case BCS selection) rules are in violation of a state law then the AG is obligated to bring suit against them. Voluntary collusion with the BCS is not a likely mitigating factor.

And then there are the antitrust implications, which the Dept. of Justice might consider pursuing.

The NCAA is clearly operating as a monopoly and in my opinion they are a very abusive monopoly. To leave the NCAA is tantamount to closing the athletic department at any major university. The NCAA knows this and often wields this power against universities.


17 posted on 03/02/2010 4:32:55 PM PST by Comstock1 (You can't have Falstaff and have him thin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

... and you just stepped all over the rights of the free market bowl games to choose who they will pay to play.


18 posted on 03/02/2010 4:37:45 PM PST by Ingtar (Reckon the process will be silly - Reckonsilliation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

I agree except instead of saying “top 16 teams” which is open to interpretation it should say the 11 divison one conference champions and 5 at large candidates.

While there will always be a debate about who the top 5 are and how they are decided at least it would still allow for 1 of the independents (Notre Dame, Army, Navy) and someone who just missed out by a squeaker to make the playoffs. At least everyone would get a chance at the ring then - and THAT is what America is about.


19 posted on 03/02/2010 7:14:20 PM PST by reed13 (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

And the BCS and major conferences who in their trust scheme prevent other conferences from participating equally in the quest for the championship step all over those conferences and colleges by preventing access to the money associated with those games thereby preventing those states’ taxpayers from benefiting as the schools in the “in” conferences/schools do.


20 posted on 03/02/2010 7:17:31 PM PST by reed13 (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson