To: driftdiver
A victim chasing two armed men to recover a couple hundred bucks is reckless. To do so driving on public streets is doubly so. You are the one assuming he did so in a calm and careful manner while managing to keep up with two desperate thieves.I assumed nothing. YOU are assuming it was reckless, which is just as wrong as assuming it was not reckless.
Since the owner was questioned and released by the police, one could infer it did not rise to the level of recklessness you assume.
37 posted on
03/06/2010 7:16:52 AM PST by
Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
To: Erik Latranyi
“Since the owner was questioned and released by the police, one could infer it did not rise to the level of recklessness you assume.”
Are these the same police that you don’t trust to use their firearm?
You have a right to defend yourself. You do not have a right to endanger anyone elses life. Choose wisely.
39 posted on
03/06/2010 7:19:15 AM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson