Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gen. Patrick R. Cleburne—Stonewall Jackson of the West
Huntington News ^ | March 6, 2010 | Calvin E. Johnson, Jr.

Posted on 03/06/2010 2:27:46 PM PST by BigReb555

Who was Gen. Patrick R. Cleburne?


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: civilwar; cleburne; confederacy; confederate; irish; robertelee; slave; slavery; south; southern; warbetweenthestates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: Sherman Logan
As do CSA apologists. If the CSA was a foreign government, as it claimed and fought to uphold, it had no rights under the Constitution.

Don't know many Southerners do you? We want you to leave, and to leave us alone. Always have, always will. Conservatives know deep down that Lincoln was a precursor to the current abomination that sits in the Oval Office - a tyrant.

BTW, the South was only an "insurrection" in Northern minds. Argue all you want, but the Constitution never forbade secession - and only the victor can lay that claim.
41 posted on 03/06/2010 7:07:24 PM PST by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Reference please. My research indicates that a grand total of 26 MD state legislators were imprisoned at different times during the war, not the whole body. There was discussion of doing so within the government, but it wasn't carried out.

Right. So a "discussion" of arresting the legistlators of a sovereign state is OK with you? The fact is, Sept 12 and 13, all "suspected southern sympatizers" of the Maryland legislature were arrested. In all 51 were arrested, and democratic government in Maryland ceased.

Lincoln established the precedent for what Obama may end up doing.

You might want to do your "research" on a site not dedicated to the homage to the false god Lincoln.
42 posted on 03/06/2010 7:16:18 PM PST by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
There weren't that many West Pointers in the Army of Tennessee, relative to the Army of Northern Virginia, who Cleburne had to compete with.

Johnston was West Point. Bragg had been West Point. The corps commanders - Hardee, Hood, Hill, Lee, Stewart, Polk - were West Point. The majority of his division commander peers were West Point. Like the Union Army, rising above the division level without the West Point credentials was difficult.

43 posted on 03/06/2010 7:53:21 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000
Of course, the point was that it was carefully crafted to free no one at the time it was issued.

It was crafted to free those slaves that Lincoln could legally free.

I didn’t realize that Lee supported voluntary colonization. Lincoln also supported the colonization movement during his political career.

And Lincoln is generally painted as a racist because of it.

44 posted on 03/06/2010 7:55:28 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat
Really? Where. When the Federal troops arrived, were the slaves freed? I would like some examples please.

There were several hundred thousand examples who joined the Union army.

The "Emancipation Proclamation" was a political stunt. Nothing more.

Then it was a very effective one.

45 posted on 03/06/2010 7:56:45 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat
Conservatives know deep down that Lincoln was a precursor to the current abomination that sits in the Oval Office - a tyrant.

Only the Lost Causers who call themselves conservatives.

BTW, the South was only an "insurrection" in Northern minds.

And the minds of the rest of the world, since none of them ever recognized confederate independence.

46 posted on 03/06/2010 7:58:58 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat
Right. So a "discussion" of arresting the legistlators of a sovereign state is OK with you? The fact is, Sept 12 and 13, all "suspected southern sympatizers" of the Maryland legislature were arrested. In all 51 were arrested, and democratic government in Maryland ceased.

They were advocating joining an armed rebellion currently being waged against the government. The term for that, I believe, is treason.

47 posted on 03/06/2010 8:00:11 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BigReb555
On Cleburne’s tombstone in Helena, Arkansas, there are five battles listed in which he was a major part...Shiloh, Perryville, Chicamauga and Franklin...care to guess what the fifth battle was? The fifth battle was one after the 9th of May, 1862, where Cleburne flanked General Popes Army and inflicted mass casualties and the North, embarrassed, erased most of the action reports and is therefore mostly lost to history. It was called, Shelton House, and was at the Siege of Corinth. There is no marker to identify the battle and except for Civil War Historians and a few interested individuals, the battle is forgotten.

When Cleburnes body was removed from the Franklin Battlefield in 1866, his body went by rail South to Mussel Shoals, AL, and then West to Corinth where his body laid in State for a day for honors, and then resumed the trek to Helena.

48 posted on 03/06/2010 9:14:03 PM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic
Grants wife, Julia Dent, left Corinth, Ms, with a wagon train loaded with furniture and booty from the plantations around NE Mississippi (Whitfield Mansion) toward Memphis the Summer of 1862. She and her entourage were stopped by Confederate Cavalry and were thought to be a Southern woman fleeing the Yankees. The comment in the cavalrymans journal was that she was a homely woman fleeing the Yankees...
49 posted on 03/06/2010 9:24:11 PM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BigReb555

I live within a mile or two from where Cleburne fell.

I go by there daily going up Columbia Pike into Franklin.

My boys know the history too, I make sure of it.


50 posted on 03/07/2010 8:56:36 AM PST by wardaddy (I'm waiting for Epic Beard Man the movie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog; BigReb555
to tell you the truth...unlike many south haters here for whom context and truth are mere irritants...I look at any historical period in context...from all angles....no one does that anymore...they simply cannot handle it...it messes up their little world view as angry black man or angry white guy taking care of poor oppressed black guy

it's a sickness....a candid discussion on slavery and black culture life between here and back in mother Africa is aways interesting

as well as just how free anyone was back then outside the US but especially back in primitive tribal chieftain west Africa

but having said all that....how Grant and Lee treated the slaves they both inherited seems to depend on whose account is reading and what their bias is

All that said....Cleburne was a remarkable field commander and struck fear in the hearts of Federals who faced him...much like Forrest..he was underutilized by Jeff Davis who should have known better.

51 posted on 03/07/2010 9:06:26 AM PST by wardaddy (I'm waiting for Epic Beard Man the movie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000

Lincoln supported colonization while president.


52 posted on 03/07/2010 10:01:41 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

I’ll say it’s lost to history. I’ve been unable to find any references to it at all. The common perception is that the Siege of Corinth was marked primarily by the evacuation of the southern armies. I’ve been unable to find any reference to such a battle at all.

There’s a Shelton House near a battlefield, but it’s in Virginia.

The situation you describe is extraordinarily odd, if true, since Pope was called east within weeks and given the Army of Virginia, which would be strange for a guy who just suffered an ignominious defeat.

The Union had so many battles to be embarassed about I wonder why they’d choose this one to do a coverup on. Chancellorsville or Second Manassas might seem a better choice.

I assume you have references for this secret battle?


53 posted on 03/07/2010 10:12:26 AM PST by Sherman Logan ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat
The fact is, Sept 12 and 13, all "suspected southern sympatizers" of the Maryland legislature were arrested. In all 51 were arrested, and democratic government in Maryland ceased.

If this is a fact, you should have no problem posting a reference to prove it.

I at least did some research, even if on a site of which you disapprove. You have merely asserted your claims are fact without proving it.

54 posted on 03/07/2010 10:14:34 AM PST by Sherman Logan ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

I’ve seen this claim made before, but I’ve yet to see any proof.

Before you go slandering a dead First Lady, perhaps you could provide some documentation.


55 posted on 03/07/2010 10:16:02 AM PST by Sherman Logan ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

By modern standards, he was a racist.


56 posted on 03/07/2010 10:48:16 AM PST by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Galveston, Texas. June 19, 1865. General Gordon Granger lands with 2000 men and issues General Order Number 3, stating that, "in accordance with a proclamation from the Executive of the United States, all slaves are free."

Depends on your definition of "free," I guess.

From the Galveston Daily News, June 20, 1865, about the actions in Galveston of the Federal Provost Marshal-General for the state of Texas, Lt. Colonel R. G. Laughlin, 13th army corps:

He [Laughlin] requested the Mayor to say to the citizens that they should meet with the fullest protection in both person and property ... that negroes fleeing from the country to this city would not be allowed to live in idleness or become a burthen [their spelling] to the people, that they would be arrested as they arrived, and forced to work on fortifications or be put to other labor. ... The Mayor said that it had been his rule to send all such negroes home, but as the United States authorities were now here he would consult them ... The Provost Marshal General said, it might be very well to send them to their homes, but as he had work for them to do, he would send them, for the present, to the Quartermaster for employment. This was accordingly done, but the Quartermaster having no immediate work for them, sent them to jail for safe-keeping till he should want them. We mention this as an indication of the policy our Government is now pursuing in relation to runaway negroes.

That is consistent with General Orders, No. 3, the Juneteenth order. It said in part, "The Freedmen are advised to remain at their present homes, and work for wages. They are informed that they will not be allowed to collect at military posts; and they will not be supported in idleness either there or elsewhere."

If memory serves me correctly, later that summer the federal army encouraged/ordered former slaves to stay on their plantations. I think the army recognized that there would be a serious food problem in Texas if former slaves did not stay on their plantations and farms and produce food.

The argument that it was necessary to keep blacks on the plantations and farms to ensure food production was also a key argument used against enrolling slaves in the Confederate Army. From the Richmond Daily Dispatch of November 9, 1864 in part of their argument against enrolling slaves in the army:

Armies must be fed, and in order to feed them, crops must be made. The negroes are our agricultural laborers. Take them from farmwork, and you destroy the army more effectually than Grant can do it with a million of men to back he has in the field.

Then, of course, there was the Federal conscription of the former slaves during the war. See my old posts from the Official Records: Link 1 and Link 2.

57 posted on 03/07/2010 11:15:37 AM PST by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
When in the Course of Human Events by Charles Adams, pages 41-48. See also, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Roger Taney's decision Ex Parte Merryman in 1861, the opinion for which Lincoln sent orders for the arrest of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
58 posted on 03/07/2010 11:57:54 AM PST by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

Well, that came out of left field. I don’t suppose you have any reference for that, do you? Other than gossip and prejudice?


59 posted on 03/07/2010 12:12:53 PM PST by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat

So it’s not kosher for me to use a source you claim is overly friendly to Lincoln as a reference, but it is ok for you to use a book specifically written as a polemic to justify secession.

Doesn’t that seem even the slightest bit unfair to you?

I don’t have access to the book. Do you have something on the web?


60 posted on 03/07/2010 12:20:05 PM PST by Sherman Logan ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson