Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: a fool in paradise

“... plaintiffs must prove government’s conduct was intentional and willful. 5 U.S.C. 552a(g)(4), [et.al]. Government is not liable for every affirmative or negligent act that technically violates the Privacy Act, “[i]stead, the violation must be so ‘patently egregious and unlawful that anyone undertaking the conduct should have known it ‘unlawful’.”

- Chief Judge Royce Lamberth
USDC District of Columbia

Mar. 9, 2010


8 posted on 03/09/2010 12:10:45 PM PST by SvenMagnussen (Quo Warranto better than Apocolypto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: SvenMagnussen

should have known it ‘unlawful’.”

...as if the smartest Yale lawyer in the world “Canckles” didn’t know it was illegal, even before her associate was copying the contents into his laptop and database at home on the kitchen table according to his wife’s testimony... riiiiiiiiiiiiight!


9 posted on 03/09/2010 12:28:34 PM PST by ElectionInspector (talk of ending these big Federal programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson