Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Former Military Chick
I don't understand all this "Beck shouldn't have interviewed him" angst. I wanted to hear from Massa. If anything, Beck did a poor job of interviewing. I've decided it's his weakest point.

And the mental image of nudie cutie Rahm yelling at people in the shower is a priceless gift. It could be the one thing that keeps him out of the illinois Senate race (there's lots of talk about him replacing the current Democrat, who's got lots of corrupt banking problems)

Why are the Dems so determined to out a groper, but Rangel gets to stay in the House? That should tell us all we need to know.

Massa lacks the resources to spill the beans. He's not rich or married to someone rich, and he doesn't have powerful friends. While I hoped he'd dish some dirt, I'm not too surprised that he didn't.

But Rahm...singin' in the shower...lol

15 posted on 03/10/2010 2:13:45 PM PST by Mamzelle (On FR, watch out for the Club of late-2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mamzelle

You gave an excellent comment, thank you. I agree Beck is lacking as an interviewer. I did watch, I appreciated Beck’s apology at the end.

I believe Beck spoke to him when Massa was angry after that radio show. Much of what he said had me interested on his perspective. Obviously after a cool down what he told Beck pre-interview did not pan out.

It was a learning process for Beck and his audience. I hope it wont preclude him from doing this again, he just needs to be better prepaired, imho.


20 posted on 03/10/2010 2:26:39 PM PST by Former Military Chick (Please pray for our troops as they selflessly serve in harm's way say an extra one for my beloved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Mamzelle
Here's the answer to the question about why the Dems are anxious to get rid of this guy. We must look back to the 1930s with the rise of the Nazi party to rule in Germany.

They'd always had homosexuals in top positions, and the head of a key Nazi component, the SA, Ernst Rolm, was certainly homosexual.

He had also been Hitler's secretary in prison and typed the text of Mein Kampf.

He wasn't the only homosexual in the top ranks.

So, how is that the Nazis got a reputation for making homosexuals wear pink triangles, and for sending them into the gas chambers? Well, the answer is not all that complex ~ in that crowd there was no institutional bias against homosexuals ~ that is, the Nazis weren't out to "get 'em". On the other hand, with so many top level people who were homosexuals it became a personal preference sort of thing.

If those low on the social ladder stepped out of line, or failed to amuse the top dogs, then they got sent to the camps. With ever shifting "love affairs" and "needs", that meant an awful lot of homosexuals displeased an awful lot of top Nazis.

It's the same with the Democrats. There if a low level Representative disrespects one of the top dogs, then they boot him out. Was sex involved? Surprisingly the answer was yes ~ It is reported that Barnie Frank's former chief of staff had been assigned to Massa's office as chief of staff. Lord only knows where else they got the "tickle boys" that made up the rest of the office.

If Massa had "proclivities" he certainly was given the opportunity to exhibit them.

He appears to have either voted wrong or not come across when approached for services.

Like I said, it's a phenomenon known with the Nazis, and it's not at all surprising to find it occurring in the ranks of the top Democrats.

24 posted on 03/10/2010 3:04:29 PM PST by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson