Posted on 03/10/2010 3:43:12 PM PST by AJKauf
Richs radicals proudly engaged in rock-throwing student riots, forcible sit-ins, and other expropriation and destruction of private property. More importantly, they actively suppressed evidence of Stalins horrors, materially supported the reigning Soviet dictators, and unabashedly exhorted Mao Zedong to continue his experiments with the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution.
Clearly their actions involved and sanctioned various degrees of force; small but still significant in the case of sit-ins, of historic proportions in the case of Communism. Yet none of this concerned them because, in their view, attacking property or compelling someone to act under threat of force is not violence and thus not objectionable. You can take a mans property, oust him from the cities, order him onto collective farms, and force him into hard labor, but as long as the threat of force is so overwhelming that he cant resist, theres no violence and no foul. Lives are shattered and destroyed, but the left approves because theres either no actual blood spilt or, in the case of Communism, the rivers of blood are carefully kept off camera. (Clearly leftists will countenance anything in the name of making men slaves to the State.)
The lefts modus operandi then, is to denounce the open use of violence, while promoting and condoning every other form of force....
(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...
BFLR
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.