I have had this conversation myriads of times over the last few months.
Think about it. The government will have access to surbeillance andassault capabilities with no warrants necessary and we would not even know.Ifthats not a problem for you, then you perhaps might rethink it on a constitutional basis.
It has to do with the 4th amendment, not google.Your argument would result in a complete loss of 4th amendment rights based on an excuse that the data is publicly available. Its a specious argument.
The Fourth Amendment’s got nothing to do with it. It has to do with the military’s capability to point and click on any map or computer image and send a missile to blow that spot. If they say, “we want to blow up Candor7’s house”, do you really thing that they can’t precisely locate your house any way except by physically sending someone there to collect the GPS data? They have your address, since they send a mailman there. They have maps. They have guided missiles that send back real time video for targeting. Why do they need to send someone to physically collect the coordinates?