NASA sickens me. They have disgraced the names of brave astronauts like Gus Grissom. Shut NASA down.
The nature of deception and fraud are such that it continues, and escalates, until it’s exposed. When they were able to fudge on a couple temperature readings and nothing happened then the practice spread. And it continued to spread from area to area until the whole was contaminated.
Maybe someone should ask Barbara Boxer about her reliance on NASA data when she was confronted about the East Anglia snafu?
NASA hasn’t had a “vision” for many decades, and they were smart enough to see the writing on the wall a few years ago regarding budget constraints related to space travel.
I am sure there was a concerted effort by the bureaucrats at NASA to seize upon global warming research as their next cash cow.
bump
“For] example, we extrapolate station measurements as much as 1200 km.”
1200 km is over 700 miles. That’s like assuming the weather conditions in NY are the same as in Tennessee.
which if you extrapolate means that the Bush Administration was fully aware of this and chose to do nothing
And now we understand why Odumboi needs a ‘new and improved’ climate ‘truth’ center. The old ones are polluted with lies.
You think the Supreme Court wants a do over?
.
More media malpractice?
“These emails, obtained by Christopher Horner, also show that the NASA GISS dataset was not independent of CRU data. “
Ping of definite interest. So yes, there has been collusion on temperature data supposedly “separately maintained.”
These two repositories were HEAVILY relied upon among global warming scientists and both are not grossly suspect.
PING!!
RICO....
More settled science.
/sarc
ping
Rush covered in his 2nd hour. Said if the Chicoms need to have their journalists educated, send them over here. We are specializing, especially at the Columbia School of Journalism.
“AlGore HAS to know all of this was fraudulent”
~~~~~~~~
Also:
Junk Science Bombshell: NASA & Media Knew About Bogus Climate Data 3 Years Ago
bfl
“Now we happily combine NCDC’s and Hadley Center data to … evaluate our model results. “
The most damning sentence of all! The models are designed to reproduce ANY history and then tested against that same data. They then assume it works going forward.
Note that every time they change the historic data set, they redo the models to fit.
BOY, what science!