Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Important GOP, word up!

Many of Reps, their Aides, etc spy FR, pay heed! We have only just begun

The measures are advancing nationally as Republicans capitalize on voter discontent over Democratic-backed federal health care reform efforts in Congress.

http://www.newstalk1230.net/pages/6549144.php?contentType=4&contentId=5728079


61 posted on 03/12/2010 1:01:15 AM PST by JustPiper (Obamacare ONGOING THREAD ~http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2437390/posts?page=855#855~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


Resolution on Preserving States’ Rights Regarding Federal Health Insurance Exchanges and a Public Plan

Model Legislation

Adopted by the Health and Human Services Task Force
May 1, 2009.

Approved by the American Legislative Exchange Council’s Board of Directors
June 6, 2009.

http://www.alec.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Health_and_Human_Services&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=10443


75 posted on 03/12/2010 1:24:27 AM PST by JustPiper (Obamacare ONGOING THREAD ~http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2437390/posts?page=855#855~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


77 posted on 03/12/2010 1:31:44 AM PST by JustPiper (Obamacare ONGOING THREAD ~http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2437390/posts?page=855#855~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Nite Y’ll

Guarding Against Mandates That Don’t Work

ALEC’s Freedom of Choice in Health Care Act would block legislation that imposes costly, bureaucratic penalties for choosing to obtain or decline health coverage. This provision strikes at the heart of an individual mandate—implemented in Massachusetts and elsewhere—that penalize individuals and businesses for failing to purchase health insurance.

The Massachusetts example is particularly instructive for states facing an individual mandate. Three years into the mandate, Massachusetts still hasn’t achieved 100% coverage—in fact, the Bay State still has more than 200,000 uninsured residents. Many of the uninsured were exempt from the mandate because coverage was too expensive. Over half of those who did get insurance got fully- or partially-subsidized coverage, courtesy of Massachusetts taxpayers.

What’s worse, health spending has increased by 42 percent in Massachusetts since the mandate was enacted; taxpayers, doctors, and hospitals are facing increased taxes and fees; and patients are finding it hard to see a doctor.

Simply put, ALEC’s Freedom of Choice in Health Care Act would protect against intrusive mandates that just don’t work.


79 posted on 03/12/2010 1:37:01 AM PST by JustPiper (Obamacare ONGOING THREAD ~http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2437390/posts?page=855#855~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson