Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exhaustedmomma
“Kathy Miller, president of the Texas Freedom Network, said the board's 10 Republicans had voted to “reject the most fundamental constitutional protection for religious freedom in America today: the principle that government may not disfavor or promote any religion over all others.”

According to judge Napalitano, this only applied to a national religion. Massachusetts, actually had a state religion at one time. So all this garbage about the USA being a “secular” country is just misinformation.

34 posted on 03/12/2010 8:24:20 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: greeneyes
What you said, I get... the nat'l religion/secularism stuff. What I don't understand... are you saying somebody in that quote is saying that? Miller? the 10 (R)'s? I really don't get what is meant by that part I quoted. Who did what, who said what, who meant what...

I do know the original "plan" was full of all kinds of messed up stuff.

The capitol building is full of Biblical references, founding father references, and Constitutional references---etched in stone. What are these people who are "really" trying to rewrite all this going to do about that??? Shiver. Scenes from Dr. Zhivago just flashed through my head.

35 posted on 03/12/2010 8:51:13 PM PST by exhaustedmomma (All might be free if they valued freedom, and defended it as they should. Samuel Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson