Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Banished! City forbids Bible studies in homes.
Worldnet Daily ^ | 3/13/10 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 03/13/2010 5:21:54 AM PST by stars & stripes forever

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last
To: COBOL2Java

Ummm...Dear Steve you just bought your city a civil rights law suit, what are you going to do NEXT???


41 posted on 03/13/2010 5:49:28 AM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sueuprising
It sounds to me like it might be an ordinance that another denomination, maybe a mainline Church, might have suggested to lessen the competition,so to speak.

Don't get out to church much, huh? That's one of the least likely scenarios. The impetus is probably is someone who was part of the targeted group who got his panties in a knot over some decision in which he felt slighted, left in a huff, and then started this to retaliate.
42 posted on 03/13/2010 5:49:48 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: alnick
three-person church leadership meetings

There goes that right to peacefully assemble.

43 posted on 03/13/2010 5:50:16 AM PST by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RepRivFarm
File for an injunction against any further action by the municipality pending a hearing.

ACLJ = American Center for Law and Justice, a Christian organization that would be happy to come to their defense.

44 posted on 03/13/2010 5:50:21 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Happens every football season.. :)


45 posted on 03/13/2010 5:50:21 AM PST by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

I just thought of another thing. I wonder if the Gibson lawmakers decided that banning home religious meetings is, in a roundabout way, preventing the possibility that Muslims might meet to plan terrorist attacks. I know I have heard that argument before when a Christian activity is banned. The real reason is to stop other groups like Muslims or satanists and the like from claiming the right to hold meetings. In today’s pc climate, you can’t ban just a few, you have to ban all. Just a thought.


46 posted on 03/13/2010 5:50:49 AM PST by sueuprising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

oops Gilbert, not Gibson... dang I knew I got that wrong.


47 posted on 03/13/2010 5:51:29 AM PST by sueuprising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

>> However.. would you REALLY want your neighbor running a church or anything else very regular out of his house filling up the street with cars ect?

They already do, in our neighborhood. Very regular bible study meeings with about THIRTY (shudder) TEENAGERS.

They don’t make noise, yes their cars fill the street to some extent, and yes, they’re teenagers so they drive like such when they’re leaving.

But they’re polite and respectful and what’s more they’re studying God’s word rather than smoking dope.

We haven’t taken a poll, but it’s certainly OK with Mrs. Tick and me and we haven’t heard anyone complain.


48 posted on 03/13/2010 5:53:48 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Eat more spinach! Make Green Jobs for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sueuprising
In today’s pc climate, you can’t ban just a few, you have to ban all. Just a thought.

The Bible study attendees should call themselves 'community organizers'. Problem solved.

49 posted on 03/13/2010 5:54:28 AM PST by stars & stripes forever ( Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

It is a dumb rule that will be changed at the next Council meeting. Listen to the whole story. The church was actually soliciting with neighborhood signs for attendees. A little different situation than what was presented (just a Bible study). Without the signs, then the church would never have been targeted.

How about signs in the neighborhood like “Come to our football party, $10 gets you drinks and snacks. Watch on a 42” television.”

A more appropriate law/code may be how many people could actually attend a function (any funcition) in a given house. This has safety and nuisance considerations.


50 posted on 03/13/2010 5:55:15 AM PST by exhaustguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

My hubby says, do it anyway and pay the fine.


51 posted on 03/13/2010 5:56:07 AM PST by MsLady (If you died tonight, where would you go? Salvation, don't leave earth without it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
From the article it seems they became aware of the meeting because of notices placed around town.

Look like someone with a grudge against religion to me.

52 posted on 03/13/2010 5:56:13 AM PST by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

Banned....in my HOME....
Like WTHell!


53 posted on 03/13/2010 5:56:33 AM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

“Don’t get out to church much, huh? That’s one of the least likely scenarios. The impetus is probably is someone who was part of the targeted group who got his panties in a knot over some decision in which he felt slighted, left in a huff, and then started this to retaliate.”
On the contrary, I am a regular Baptist Church attendee for 25 years. I was just thinking of scenarios that might have caused this odd law to come into effect. ALthough I agree that a large church interfering with the practices of non denominational ones is a long shot, it is certainly not unheard of. I was once a member of the Anglican Church, and they could not resist taking pot shots, albeit polite ones, at fundamentalist churches. A local cable station that is all Roman Catholic also presents programming that marginalizes Protestant groups in general. So, the possibility exists although not probable.


54 posted on 03/13/2010 5:57:01 AM PST by sueuprising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

Relabel the meetings “parties” and keep right on holding them.


55 posted on 03/13/2010 5:57:21 AM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever
Bring it, you powers of darkness! Christ is Victor! This is nothing but pure religious persecution of Christians. Christians rejoice when they suffer for the Name.

But in our country, this is unconstitutional, and these nattering Nabobs of negativity should lose their jobs, at the very least. Too bad we don't have Haman's gallows...

56 posted on 03/13/2010 5:57:41 AM PST by backwoods-engineer ("It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself." --Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

When I first saw the headline I thought, this must be in a place like Dubai or Yemen or something. Gilbert, AZ? WTF?
Um, seems to me there’s a right to free expression of religion. And of speech. And the right of the People to peaceably assemble.


57 posted on 03/13/2010 5:58:16 AM PST by Cymbaline (Bipartisan consensus - that's like when my doctor and my lawyer agree with my wife that I need help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
I once belonged to a small church. We started out meeting at a school. Had to sue the school district to have the right. They had some lame argument about seperation of church and state but allowed some pretty unconventional groups to use the same facilities at different times.
58 posted on 03/13/2010 5:59:11 AM PST by cpa4you (CPA4YOU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

It’s dhimmies like this crew that are bringing the Country to it’s knees, and not only with stupid announcements like this...their peers in Government at all levels are violating the oaths they took to “Protect and Defend...” almost as soon as they took office. What’s worse, we actually pay these yammerheads a lot of money to come up with insanity like this.

This is the stuff that feeds revolutions, and a lot of people around the country have had just about enough of this. At some point we need to tear it down and get back to basics the way this Country was intended to be run.

If the Founders were to pop back in right now, they would not recognize the Country we have created, and would be stunned that we so casually threw everything they created for us away.


59 posted on 03/13/2010 6:00:40 AM PST by Bean Counter (I keeps mah feathers numbered, for just such an emergency...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cymbaline

The lawyer must be having a field day, trying to figure out what constitutional right they are going to defend, Freedom of Religion, Freedom to Assemble, or Freedom of Speech


60 posted on 03/13/2010 6:00:43 AM PST by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson