Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bruinbirdman
This is just a preview for what Zero is planning for USA and it's currently flawed Constitutional Governance! - Mark my words!
3 posted on 03/13/2010 11:02:25 PM PST by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: J Edgar

Obama wants the WH to be the House of the One True Lord.


5 posted on 03/13/2010 11:04:11 PM PST by ari-freedom (Rush:Remember to put your faith in ideas and not people. People will always, always disappoint you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: J Edgar
This is just a preview for what Zero is planning for USA

The first rule of Communism: abolish the concept of private property.

7 posted on 03/13/2010 11:05:51 PM PST by Bernard Marx (I donÂ’t trust the reasoning of anyone who writes then when they mean than.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: J Edgar; BillyBoy; bruinbirdman; C19fan

The House of Lords currently has almost no power so it’s an utter waste of time and money for them to exist. Basically they are a pointless debating society.

Back when they did have power it was disgusting that they did because it was a council of nobles who have no right to rule by virtue of their damn birth.

Not too long ago they kicked most of the hereditary nobles out leaving only a small percentage of them. So it’s mostly made up of “life peers” appointed for life for various vague reasons either on the advice of the PM (some as a reward for fundraising) or some stupid appointments commission made up of current lords.

So basically it’s like having the President or some Senate committee choose new Senators. Utterly ridiculous.

There’s a good argument that there should be an upper house to check the power of the House of Commons. If Britain is to have an empowered Upper House it must be elected to have the legitimacy to have power over legislation. I hate to agree with Labour but they are absolutely right to pursue this. They should have done it 10 years ago.

Critics say this current plan would suck cause it would just be a new house of career politicians (good point) as opposed what they have now with some technocrats with “expertise” on various issues.

That brings me to the other option favored by another party that I hate to agree with, the Lib Dems, they want to abolish the upper house.

I say anointed technocrats have no right to legislate no matter how much the media may love the idea. Let the “non-partisan” technocrats run for office and win if they can. There should be an elected upper house with real power or no upper house.


17 posted on 03/15/2010 7:32:13 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson