Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: etraveler13

Which Supreme Court case establishes that we shouldn’t question the entire background of a candidate or an office holder, especially when there is overwhelming circumstantial evidence suggesting a coverup of his background?


3 posted on 03/14/2010 12:09:16 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Hey you noble leftists. You can't be honest about your agenda because you're not confident in it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith

These decisions define who is and who is not a Natural Born Citizen.
IMO, every candidate for POTUS should be completely vetted, and it should be made clear to the voting public.


7 posted on 03/14/2010 12:15:24 PM PDT by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson