Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BarnacleCenturion
-- The public option seems to be back. From page 1167 of the bill. --

What you are reading is going to be erased, and replaced with new language. Did you read the article you posted? Even the snippet describes that the what is now available for reading is NOT what is going to be proposed for passage.

10 posted on 03/15/2010 5:12:29 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt; Trust but Verify

“What you are reading is going to be erased”

How do you know? I read the article but it will only be erased when the committee votes to erase it.

Remember that the dims in the house want the public option in the bill. The senate removed it in December because they needed 60 votes. If they use the nuclear option they won’t need 60 votes anymore.


16 posted on 03/15/2010 5:26:06 AM PDT by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt
What you are reading is going to be erased, and replaced with new language. Did you read the article you posted? Even the snippet describes that the what is now available for reading is NOT what is going to be proposed for passage.

The same thing happened in the senate amnesty bill in 2007. They used an old bill structure and replaced the whole thing. Meanwhile FReepers kept commenting on the old text. When I pointed out what was going on, they called me a newbie troll.

51 posted on 03/15/2010 2:13:40 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Pat Caddell: Democrats are drinking kool-aid in a political Jonestown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson