Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man
If it doesn’t in the end generate revenue, how can it be good publicity?

In Hollyweird, it's a fact of life that not every movie an actor is in is a hit. This doesn't change the bankability of certain actors. Just because this one was a flop doesn't mean that Matt Damon doesn't put butts in seats. It just means that the vehicle he chose this time wasn't that good.

I am saying these two sayings aren’t always true. The fact people are swearing off certain actors for life is not evidence of bad publicity being good publicity.

How many people actually swear off actors for life? In reality, not that many. Most people aren't news junkies. Most could care less about an actor's politics as long as he's in an entertaining movie. It wasn't Matt Damon that made this most recent flick a flop. It was that no one wanted to see (yet another) movie about the war in Iraq.

30 posted on 03/15/2010 2:22:16 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (People should not be afraid of the government. Governement should be afraid of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Ol' Dan Tucker
It wasn't Matt Damon that made this most recent flick a flop.

If the star of the film had been Matt Noname instead of Matt Damon the film would have flopped far worse. Probably 90% of the people that saw it went to see a Matt Damon movie not a "Liberals Bash the US" movie.

Of course, if the star of the film had been Matt Noname it wouldn't have cost $230 Million to make either.

31 posted on 03/15/2010 3:12:42 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson