Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Fair Health Insurance Premiums" Won't Be Fair For Smokers
Senate Version of Health Care Bill Sec 2701 | self

Posted on 03/19/2010 11:38:01 AM PDT by fruser1

Sec 2701 allows an extra 50% on premiums for smokers. I'm sure there's a bunch of smoke-nazi's out there that love this, but isn't this discriminatory? What's the surcharge for other risky behavior? There's probably just as much in medical expenses spent on sports injuries, considering that there are so many of them compared to cancer cases. Why not surcharge those folks?

Considering you'd HAVE to carry a policy, this is a defacto tax on a legal activity/lifestyle, hence my opinion that it's discriminatory.

And how do you enforce that anyway? If someone hands out cigars at the office because they're having a baby, does that mean everyone who takes a puff pays higher rates for a year?

Any lawyers out there willing to represent smokers in these cases?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: healthcare; healthcarebill; obamacare; smokers; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: fruser1

I seriously injured my shoulder wrestling in college. That was over 30 years ago. Every few years i have to get physical therapy. Sports related and i suspect (tho hope not) that i will be back for more therapy at some point.


41 posted on 03/19/2010 12:33:05 PM PDT by wiggen (Never in the history of our great country have the people had less representation than they do today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

Everybody dies. Smokers tend to die from quick-killing, relatively inexpensive stuff. Non-smokers tend to linger and linger, racking up one expensive debilitating condition after another, while the meter keeps running. They use up their assets, and end up on the dole, financed by the taxpayer. Truth be known, smokers are probably saving us money, not costing us.


42 posted on 03/19/2010 12:37:13 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

How about a 50% premium for those that eat fried chicken?

That should take care of some of his base.


43 posted on 03/19/2010 12:38:22 PM PDT by Gator113 (I do not want Obama just IMPEACHED... I want him IMPRISONED. Are we there yet? 2010-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

Smokers don’t all die early. Smoking contributes to high blood pressure and to strokes. Those people are the ones who lay around nursing homes needing 24 hour a day care for years, my mother was one of them. COPD also requires expensive long term care my father was one of those.


44 posted on 03/19/2010 12:39:05 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger

We have a WIC office in my neighborhood. Can’t find a parking space because of all their patron’s SUV’s.


45 posted on 03/19/2010 12:41:57 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: namvolunteer

LOL - next they will be coming for your bacon!


46 posted on 03/19/2010 12:43:03 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Gator113
How about a 50% premium for those that eat fried chicken?

That should take care of some of his base.


Ohhhhhhh, rim shot. No basketball analogy pun meant.
47 posted on 03/19/2010 12:44:25 PM PDT by crosshairs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Pietro
Sounds like some sort of perverted iPhone commercial ...

"There's a tax for that!"

48 posted on 03/19/2010 12:47:33 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

People pay a higher auto premium for tickets because ALL traffic tickets, speeding or otherwise, are risky behaviour with a higher liklihood of incurring expense (accidents).

Hence, for health insurance, wouldn’t ALL risky behavior with a higher liklihood of incurring medical expenses be charged appropriately?

I have no problem w/the market deciding, even if they want to single out smokers.

However, the health care bill will REQUIRE everyone to have it. As of today, if my health insurance wants to charge me more for smoking, I can decide whether or not I want to keep the policy. With this law, I won’t, so I’ll be in court (or jail).


49 posted on 03/19/2010 12:59:07 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: namvolunteer

Well I hope some of those idiots in Congress die from the stress of Obama. Preferrably before 2PM Sunday!!


50 posted on 03/19/2010 1:06:34 PM PDT by Semperfiwife (My doctor is NOT a congressman. They have not healed anyone, but hurt plenty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: historyrepeatz

You do pay more for health insurance if you are overweight, or undertall, and if you have a family history of certain illnesses. Same thing for life insurance.


51 posted on 03/19/2010 1:12:09 PM PDT by RobFromGa (The FairTax is to tax policy as Global Warming is to science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

It’s a little tedious to mince words online, but I think my use of the word “fair” needs some elaboration.

As far as I know, I can start a private “guys only” club as long as it remains “private”. If I get public money, I cannot exclude women, i.e., I can’t discriminate, I have to be “fair”.

Per this post, by “fair” I mean that if the government REQUIRES an insurance policy AND the policy charges more for one type of behavior that MAY lead to increased expenses, then it should not discriminate and charge more for ALL such behaviors to be “fair”.

I hope that explains my intent w/that one.

Since some don’t like the sports analogy, consider this, heart disease has ALWAYS been the #1 killer. While this category does include smokers, most are not. So how about having your doctor calculating your ideal weight and then you get charged a few bucks per pound per month for which you are overweight. (The natural question here is, are you filet mignon or ground chuck?)

On another point, consider this: it’s not just smokers who will be “paying” for that extra 50% premium.

Since there’s a higher proportion of smokers in the lower income brackets, guess what - their increased policy cost is going to be SUBSIDIZED.

That means that EVERYONE pays it one way or another. Higher income folks will be subsidizing poorer smokers through their taxes and lower income folks, not paying taxes, will be paying via lower wage jobs if they get a job at all. Of course, if they don’t, everyone else will pay for that too.

Fair enough?


52 posted on 03/19/2010 1:46:09 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pietro

Just the start:
Eat meat? That’s a tax

Eat sweets? That’s a tax.

Ride a cycle? That’s a tax.

Drive a truck? That’s tax.

Own land? That’s a tax.

Drink beer? That’s a tax.

Like fried food? That’s a tax.

Drink sody pop? BIG tax


53 posted on 03/19/2010 3:08:09 PM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
Smoking contributes to high blood pressure and to strokes.

So do potato chips and chicken wings.

Should we double the price of those with axes as well?

54 posted on 03/19/2010 6:56:20 PM PDT by Ditto (Directions for Clean Government: If they are in, vote them out. Rinse and repeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

I was replying to you, not the article. What do axes have to do with anything?


55 posted on 03/19/2010 8:10:11 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: lucky american

We already have fees on insurance for years if you are caught speeding in this state.

What price America’s health, sir.

Fair is fair.


56 posted on 03/22/2010 11:14:33 AM PDT by swarthyguy (Join ACFANS - Alleged Conservatives For A Nanny State. www.acfans.com (Ha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: fruser1
If someone hands out cigars at the office because they're having a baby, does that mean everyone who takes a puff pays higher rates for a year?

Don't do it. Those Itsaboy cigars are horrible.

57 posted on 03/22/2010 11:17:00 AM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

I was driving around downtown and uptown Denver yesterday afternoon. It was a beautiful day and all the outdoor patios at the bar/grills were full. Young libs (most young folk in Denver are libs) drinking beer and smoking, enjoying their freedom. I just laughed bitterly. Little do these morons know what they are about to get hit with.


58 posted on 03/22/2010 11:17:19 AM PDT by keepitreal ( Don't tread on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson