When you accuse people of lying, you have to specifically document that lie. Otherwise, you're making a false accusation. I seems to be a favorite tatic of yours: You call people liars without eing able to substantiate. This is called "libel" in our court system. I could sue you for it (and win) if I didn't think you were a complete jackass, and beneath my consideration.
And Ive proven that pretty concisely in post 30. Care to rebut?
The quote you provided does say what you seem to think it does. It has been thoroughly rebutted directly to you be myself and other FReepers on other threads. Ronald Reagan's presidency adhered to many fiscally conservative principals. Reagan directly opposed the libertarian position on virtually all social issues. It also opposed conservatism on most other issues. The quote you provided is from a 1975 interview published in the leading libertarian magazine. At the time, Reagan was challenging a Republican incubant, and looking for all the votes he could get. He tries as hard as he can to say something nice about libertarianism. In the end, he concedes that there are differnces between Conservatism and Libertarianism, and the he is not a Libertarian.
Now, you know all of this, because we have been over it before. And you have been over it with other FReepers. The fact that you contine to hold out hope for this quote at the salvation on libertarianism, suggests to me that you are at best a bit delusional. Only an idiot could look at Reagan's record and conclude that the man had anything but distain for libertarianism.
PS: If you read my original response, you’d realize I never said Reagan claimed he was libertarian, as you claim, along with your other falsehoods.
But he did recognize it as an ally, unlike you.
Here's an excerpt from http://reason.com/archives/1975/07/01/inside-ronald-reagan
REASON: Governor Reagan, you have been quoted in the press as saying that youre doing a lot of speaking now on behalf of the philosophy of conservatism and libertarianism. Is there a difference between the two?
REAGAN: If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberalsif we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.
Anybody who's interested in the truth of the matter should read the entire interview.
I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism.
It doesn't seem like Ronald Reagan strained very hard when he said that. In fact, he didn't remotely disagree with the REASON interviewer's statement that he was "speaking now on behalf of the philosophy of conservatism and libertarianism". If anything, Reagan is uncomfortable with having to use the "misnomer" of "conservative" because he considers himself a classical Liberal.
Does presidio9 have some inside knowledge about this interview, or is he just making an assertion from ignorance?